The Constitution and federal law do not permit the development of a patchwork of state and local immigration policies throughout the country

UPI NewsTrack TopNews Jul 06, 2010

A law enforcement officer, without a warrant, may arrest a person if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed any public offense that makes the person removable from the United States

Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Challenge to Ariz. law may be shaky May 30, 2010

It's disappointing to see them limiting their attention to the issu

Senators support Ariz. immigration moves Apr 19, 2010

If a non-discriminatory law is supported by valid neutral justifications, those justifications should not be disregarded simply because partisan interests may have provided one motivation for the votes of individual legislators. The state interests identified as justifications for (the law) are both neutral and sufficiently strong to require us to reject petitioners' facial attack on the statute. The application of the statute to the vast majority of Indiana voters is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.

Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Challenge to Ariz. law may be shaky May 30, 2010

Where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made, when practicable, to determine the immigration status of the person. The person's immigration status shall be verified with the federal government

Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Challenge to Ariz. law may be shaky May 30, 2010