Advertisement

Outside View: Georgia war lessons

By ILYA KRAMNIK, UPI Outside View Commentator

MOSCOW, Aug. 14 (UPI) -- The hostilities involving Russian and Georgian troops in the Georgian secessionist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia have eclipsed the Olympic Games in Beijing. This August already has entered the annals of history, but the situation continues to develop.

The situation has both military and political aspects. Militarily, the predictions of most experts have been vindicated -- Georgia's blitzkrieg against South Ossetia has failed. Even in the first half of Aug. 8, when Russian troops had yet to reach the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali, and flights by Russian aircraft were not frequent, the Georgian troops managed to occupy the greater part of the city only after the second attempt.

Advertisement

At the same time, the Georgian troops demonstrated their ability to operate in a complicated situation. The South Ossetian volunteers were no less ready to resist the attack.

Advertisement

Russian armed forces deserve special mention. While being in far from its best shape, the Russian war machine proved to be quite efficient at all levels. Strategically, it was fast in making a decision and introducing troops. Operationally, it had enough combat-ready units at division level that could be quickly brought into action. Tactically, the Russian army had to limit the use of heavy artillery and aviation to avoid civilian losses.

However, Russian efforts to suppress Georgian air defenses were not that great, and the Russian air force lost more aircraft than it should have. But this is the first time since World War II that the Russian air force has had to deal with air defense systems more serious than small-caliber artillery and PZRKs -- handheld anti-aircraft missile systems.

The Russian Black Sea Fleet in timely fashion carried out a landing operation in Abkhazia. This is the first time it has engaged in action since World War II.

As for the political situation, it is rather favorable to Russia. Apart from the former Soviet republic of Georgia itself, only the United States, the three Baltic nations of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, and Poland are obviously hostile toward Russia. The majority of states are urging both sides to adopt a cease-fire and return to the prewar situation. Russia's ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, has done a very good job of upholding Moscow's position, rebutting accusations of aggression and preventing the formation of an anti-Russian coalition.

Advertisement

It is hard to make forecasts in a constantly changing situation, but from what information we have, it seems that Russia's main goal is to destroy Georgia's military equipment and infrastructure, and deprive it of the ability to engage in active military operations. Russia is likely to continue bombing installations on Georgian territory, oust the Georgian troops from South Ossetia, and create a security belt around it, and around Abkhazia. At the same time, Russia will be limited in using heavy artillery for the reasons mentioned above.

It is clear that the anti-Russian coalition does not exist. The operation is likely to be completed in the next few days, after which talks will be resumed.

The future of the Georgian leadership is the most interesting political issue. Some experts believe that Russia may demand extradition of some Georgian leaders for a trial.

To sum up, Russia's actions have been undoubtedly positive for the Russian national interest Russia has demonstrated its readiness to use all means, including armed force, for the protection of its citizens and national interests.

--

(Ilya Kramnik is a military commentator for the RIA Novosti news agency. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)

Advertisement

--

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Latest Headlines