Advertisement

Illinois sues Standard & Poor's

Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois speaks during a news conference announcing federal and state plans to combat criminals looking to defraud people benefiting from the Obama administration's Making Home Affordable program at the Treasury Department in Washington on April 6, 2009. (UPI Photo/Roger L. Wollenberg)
Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois speaks during a news conference announcing federal and state plans to combat criminals looking to defraud people benefiting from the Obama administration's Making Home Affordable program at the Treasury Department in Washington on April 6, 2009. (UPI Photo/Roger L. Wollenberg) | License Photo

CHICAGO, Jan. 25 (UPI) -- Illinois sued Standard & Poor's Wednesday, alleging it fueled the housing market crash with its unwarranted high ratings to risky mortgage-backed investments.

In a lawsuit filed in Cook County Circuit Court, state Attorney General Lisa Madigan alleges S&P compromised its independence as a ratings agency by assigning high ratings to unworthy, risky investments as a corporate strategy to increase its revenue and market share.

Advertisement

In a release posted on the attorney general's Web site, Madigan alleges S&P shrugged off the increasing risks posed by mortgage-backed securities and gave the investment pools ratings that were favorable to its investment bank clients and S&P's profits.

"Publicly, S&P took every opportunity to proclaim their analyses and ratings as independent, objective and free from its desire for revenue," Madigan said. "Yet privately, S&P abandoned its principles and instead used every trick possible to give deals high ratings in order to retain clients and generate revenue. The mortgage-backed securities that helped our market soar -- and ultimately crash -- could not have been purchased by most investors without S&P's seal of approval."

The lawsuit cites internal e-mails and conversations among S&P employees in the run-up to the housing market's collapse as evidence the company misrepresented its ratings as objective and independent.

Advertisement

Latest Headlines

Advertisement

Trending Stories

Advertisement

Follow Us

Advertisement