Advertisement

Supreme Court allows Pennsylvania, North Carolina to accept mail ballots after Nov. 3

Supreme Court allows Pennsylvania, North Carolina to accept mail ballots after Nov. 3
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled to allow both Pennsylvania and North Carolina to extend the deadlines to accept absentee ballots beyond Election Day on Nov. 3. Photo by Gary C. Caskey/UPI  | License Photo

Oct. 28 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed election officials in Pennsylvania and North Carolina to accept absentee ballots that arrive after Election Day.

The court declined a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to decide before Election Day whether the deadline for accepting mail ballots can be extended to Nov. 6 and in North Carolina allowed lower courts' rulings that would extend the deadline up to nine days after Nov. 3.

Advertisement

Both decisions were announced in unsigned orders, an abnormality for emergency cases.

Wednesday's decision on the Pennsylvania case came after a deadlocked 4-4 vote by the court on Oct. 19 left the state Supreme Court's ruling to allow the extension to remain in place.

RELATED More than 70M have already voted in U.S., election monitor says

The court did indicate they may return to the case after the election, which may lead to some ballots received after Election Day disqualified.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who joined the court on Tuesday, did not take part in either case as a court spokeswoman said she'd "not had time to fully review the parties' filings."

In a statement, Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas -- all of whom previously said they would have granted the Republican Party's application to intervene -- said the court's handling of the case "needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious post-election problems."

Advertisement
RELATED Vote-counting process could extend way beyond election night

"But I reluctantly conclude there is simply not enough time at this late date to decide the question before the election," Alito wrote.

In the North Carolina case, the Supreme Court was asked to weigh in on whether the state board of elections was permitted to use its powers to address natural disasters to add increase the deadline for receiving ballots from three days to nine days.

The same three conservative judges dissented from the ruling with Gorsuch and Alito criticizing the board's "constitutional overreach."

RELATED Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejects signature matching on mail-in ballots

"Such last-minute changes by largely unaccountable bodies, too, invite confusion, risk altering election outcomes and in the process threaten voter confidence in the results," the ruling said.

Latest Headlines

Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us

Advertisement