Advertisement

U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Texas abortion challenge

By Doug G. Ware
Anti-abortion protesters spar with abortion rights supporters during the March for Life on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., last year. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to a Texas law that has reduced the number of abortion providers in that state, largely due to new legal restrictions and requirements imposed on clinics that perform abortions. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI
Anti-abortion protesters spar with abortion rights supporters during the March for Life on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., last year. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to a Texas law that has reduced the number of abortion providers in that state, largely due to new legal restrictions and requirements imposed on clinics that perform abortions. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo

WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a challenge to a new Texas law that has dwindled the number of abortion clinics in the Lone Star State -- in what will be the high court's first major abortion case in eight years.

The challenge takes on a Texas law passed in 2013 that has reduced the number of abortion providers in Texas from about 40 to about 10.

Advertisement

The Texas law that has caused so many clinics to shut down mandates that abortion providers have the same standards as "ambulatory surgical centers," with certain requirements for equipment, staff and infrastructure.

The challengers to the law say it will "delay or prevent thousands of women from obtaining abortions and lead some to resort to unsafe or illegal methods of ending an unwanted pregnancy."

"There would be no licensed abortion facilities west of San Antonio," the challengers' brief said.

Opponents to the Texas law say the regulations are unnecessary and expensive, and some say they are designed to weed out abortion clinics.

Advertisement

"Women's access to high-quality, evidence-based abortion care should not be limited by laws enacted under the guise of patient safety but that, in fact, harm women's health," the brief, Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, says.

"Today the Supreme Court took an important step toward restoring the constitutional rights of millions of women, which Texas politicians have spent years dismantling through deceptive laws and regulatory red tape," said Center for Reproductive Rights official Nancy Northup.

Proponents of the law say the provisions are necessary to ensure women's health and safety.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a fervent supporter of the 2013 law, believes the Supreme Court should not hear the case because the high court, he said, is not qualified to become a "ex officio medical board" that determines national medical standards.

The Supreme Court's ruling in the case is expected to have far-reaching implications on the issue of abortion nationwide.

The Supreme Court's willingness to hear the challenge comes at a time when abortion is receiving renewed attention -- partially due to the controversy over supposed "undercover" videos that depict Planned Parenthood personnel discussing the sale of fetal tissue.

Advertisement

Lawmakers have been investigating the videos, and some have attempted to strip the organization of its federal funding. Some Democrats and Planned Parenthood's president, though, maintain that the videos are edited and not an accurate representation of the organization's operational principles.

Latest Headlines