Advertisement

U.N. votes to start negotiating global nuclear weapons ban

The proposal was opposed by all nine countries that have nuclear weapons, including the United States.

By Stephen Feller
U.N. votes to start negotiating global nuclear weapons ban
More than 120 nations voted to start negotiating next March at the United Nations to ban nuclear weapons globally. Aside from testing, nuclear weapons have only been used twice in the history of human warfare, the first time being in Hiroshima, Japan, pictured above on August 6, 1945. The use of that nuclear weapon, as well as another detonated over Nagasaki, caused so much death and destruction that most of the world has agreed in the last 80 years to do everything possible to prevent their use again. File photo by UPI | License Photo

NEW YORK, Oct. 28 (UPI) -- As nations with nuclear weapons modernize their arsenals, and in some cases increase their size, non-nuclear countries overwhelmingly embraced a proposed ban on nuclear weapons in a United Nations committee meeting Thursday.

A vote in the U.N.'s disarmament and internationals security committee offered solid support for a global ban on nuclear weapons, with 123 nations voting in favor, 38 opposing and 16 abstaining from the vote.

Advertisement

Among those voting against the ban were all nine of the countries known to have nuclear weapons -- the United States, Britain, Israel, Russia, China, France, India, Pakistan and North Korea.

Even without the support of all five veto-bearing permanent members of the security council, the ban will be considered by the U.N.'s General Assembly in March, when much of the world now expects to start negotiating a legally-binding path to the elimination of all nuclear weapons on Earth.

RELATED U.S., Japan, South Korea urge North Korea to give up nuclear weapons

Many states protected by countries with nuclear weapons also voted against the global ban, with Australia among the most vocal.

"We do not support a ban treaty," said Richard Sadleir, assistant secretary of Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. "A ban treaty that does not include the nuclear weapons states, those states which possess nuclear weapons, and is disconnected from the rest of the security environment, would be counterproductive and not lead to reductions in nuclear arsenals."

Advertisement

Proponents of the measure say that, even without the initial support of nuclear countries, the pressure from the rest of the world to draw down and destroy the 15,000 nuclear weapons deployed globally will eventually be successful.

RELATED NATO increasing military presence in Eastern Europe to counter Russia

The United States reiterated its support for the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which restricts countries from becoming nuclear and seeks to limit the creation of new nuclear weapons, rather than to seek a blanket ban.

In a statement, the U.S. Department of State said a ban is impractical and ignores security concerns around the world which are, arguably, kept in check with the deterrent of mutually-assured destruction.

"The challenges to disarmament are a result of the political, technical and security realities we presently face," Robert Wood, the U.S. special representative to the conference on disarmament at the United Nations, said in remarks today. "The United States is ready to take additional steps including bilateral reductions with Russia and a treaty ending the production of fissile material for use in nuclear weapons. Unfortunately, some states are currently unwilling to engage in further nuclear reductions, and others are increasing their arsenals. At the same time, violations of international norms and existing agreements are creating a more uncertain security environment and making the conditions for further reductions more difficult to achieve. A ban treaty will do nothing to address these underlying challenges."

Advertisement

Latest Headlines

Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us

Advertisement