Advertisement

Texas state court throws out lawsuit against doctor who violated abortion law

By Eleanor Klibanoff, Texas Tribune
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC on Monday, November 1, 2021. On Thursday, a Texas judge threw out a lawsuit against a local doctor who performed an abortion after the state's stringent anti-abortion law was in effect. File Photo by Tasos Katopodis/UPI
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC on Monday, November 1, 2021. On Thursday, a Texas judge threw out a lawsuit against a local doctor who performed an abortion after the state's stringent anti-abortion law was in effect. File Photo by Tasos Katopodis/UPI | License Photo

Dec. 8 (UPI) -- A judge in San Antonio has thrown out a lawsuit filed against a Texas abortion provider who intentionally violated a controversial state abortion law.

The law, known as Senate Bill 8, allows anyone to bring a lawsuit against someone who "aids or abets" in an abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy. On Thursday, state District Judge Aaron Haas in Bexar County said people who have no connection to the prohibited abortion and have not been harmed by it do not have standing to bring these lawsuits.

Advertisement

Thursday's ruling sets an important precedent but does not overturn the law, said Marc Hearron, senior counsel for the Center for Reproductive Rights.

When SB 8 went into effect in September 2021, it was the most restrictive abortion law in the nation. The law banned abortions after the detection of fetal cardiac activity, usually around six weeks of pregnancy, a point at which many people don't yet know they are pregnant.

RELATED First Gen Z member of Congress struggles to find housing in D.C.

Almost all of the clinics in the state immediately stopped providing abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. The law's unique civil enforcement mechanism made it difficult to challenge in court without a test case. Dr. Alan Braid, a San Antonio doctor who had provided abortions in Texas since Roe vs. Wade was handed down in 1973, decided to intentionally violate the law to attract one of these private lawsuits.

Advertisement

"I wanted to make sure that Texas didn't get away with its bid to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested," Braid wrote in an op-ed in The Washington Post.

Three lawsuits were filed against Braid immediately. Two were never formally served, Hearron said, but one, filed by a Chicago resident named Felipe Gomez, proceeded through the courts. Thursday's ruling in the Gomez case is the first and only SB 8 case to be resolved in court. Hearron said he anticipated that Gomez, who represented himself, would appeal the decision.

RELATED 2022 year in review: Roe vs. Wade, War in Ukraine, losing Queen Elizabeth II

Gomez could not immediately be reached for comment.

In addition to the six-week ban, which is civilly enforced, Texas is also operating under several criminal abortion bans that went into effect after the overturning of Roe vs. Wade in June. Doctors who provide abortions in Texas can face up to life in prison.

In the wake of those laws going into effect, Braid closed his clinic in San Antonio, as well as its sister facility in Tulsa.

RELATED Indiana AG files complaint against doctor who provided abortion to 10-year-old

"It is heartbreaking that Texans still can't get essential health care in their home state and that providers are left afraid to do their jobs," Braid said in a statement. "Though we were forced to close our Texas clinic, I will continue serving patients across the region with the care they deserve at new clinics in Illinois and New Mexico."

Advertisement

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune. Read the original here. The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans -- and engages with them -- about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Latest Headlines

Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us

Advertisement