The solicitor general's filing argues that a lower court ruling that grants the breaks should stand without further review in the high court.
"In the view of the United States, the petition for writ of certiorari should be denied," the filing states.
Virgin America flight attendants in California won a lower court ruling last year that said the carrier failed to comply with state law that guarantees rest breaks. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI
Virgin America says that it should not have to comply with the California labor law for flight crews because the airline says it's expressly preempted by the federal Airline Deregulation Act.
The high court must now determine whether California-based flight attendants on flights in the state are entitled to the breaks under state or federal authority.
The group of flight attendants won their case in the lower Ninth Circuit last year, but Virgin America appealed the complaint to the Supreme Court.
The airline says that the lower court's decision to allow the breaks could lead to "nationwide havoc in the airline industry" and force carriers to staff more flight attendants and pilots and ultimately "displace" passengers.