Texas court allows child abuse probes into families of transgender teens to continue

By Eleanor Klibanoff, The Texas Tribune
Texas court allows child abuse probes into families of transgender teens to continue
Jey Austen listens to the testimony of an anonymous transgender child during the Trans Kids Cry for HELP! rally on March 13 against Gov. Greg Abbott's directive to investigate parents who provide gender-affirming care to their kids. Photo by Lauren Witte/The Texas Tribune

May 13 (UPI) -- Texas' child welfare agency remains blocked from investigating the family of a transgender teen who sued the state in March, but can once again investigate other families who provide gender-affirming care after the Supreme Court of Texas struck down a statewide injunction Friday.

Though it overturned the injunction on procedural grounds, the high court raised questions about why the Department of Family and Protective Services opened these investigations in the first place. The court affirmed in Friday's ruling that neither Attorney General Ken Paxton nor Gov. Greg Abbott had any grounds to direct the agency's actions.


In February, Paxton issued a nonbinding legal opinion that equated certain medical treatments and procedures for transgender teens with child abuse. Abbott, citing that opinion, then sent a letter to DFPS directing the agency to investigate parents who provided gender-affirming care to their transgender children.


In a statement responding to the order, DFPS said it would "follow Texas law" as laid out in Paxton's opinion, "[i]n accordance with Governor Abbott's directive." The agency proceeded to open at least nine investigations into parents of transgender children.

RELATED Arizona school district bucks law on transgender student athletes

"The governor and the attorney general were certainly well within their rights to state their legal and policy views on this topic, but DFPS was not compelled by law to follow them," Friday's ruling reads. "DFPS's press statement, however, suggests that DFPS may have considered itself bound by either the governor's letter, the attorney general's opinion, or both. Again, nothing before this court supports the notion that DFPS is so bound."

The ruling does note the myriad "informal mechanisms" through which elected officials can influence a state agency, but "ultimately, however, one department or another has the final say."

In this case, the ruling said, DFPS was responsible for deciding whether these investigations aligned with current state regulations -- and will have to decide whether to continue these investigations and allow new ones to be opened.

RELATED Federal judge hears case against Alabama law banning youth transgender treatment

DFPS employees have told The Texas Tribune that agency leadership has acknowledged that these investigations do not meet the current requirements for child abuse and have said policy would need to be generated to match the governor's directives.


In March, a district judge granted an injunction blocking the state from continuing these investigations or opening new ones. Paxton appealed that decision to the Third Court of Appeals, which reinstated the statewide temporary injunction.

He then petitioned the Supreme Court of Texas to review that appeal. In Friday's ruling, the high court agreed with Paxton that the appeals court overstepped -- while the appeals court can reinstate an injunction if it "preserves the parties' rights," they cannot reinstate a temporary injunction of any nature.

RELATED Most transgender children who socially transition stick with gender identity

In this case, the justices ruled, the "parties" are the family that sued the state initially -- not all parents of all transgender children.

Ian Pittman, an Austin attorney representing two families of transgender children who are under investigation for child abuse, said the injunction had allowed his clients to "breathe a sigh of relief" while their investigations were paused. Although the investigations can resume, he's hopeful that DFPS will close out the cases.

"This ruling reaffirms that [DFPS Commissioner Jaime Masters] acted improperly when she acknowledged the directive and said they would follow it," he said. "She was abdicating her responsibilities as commissioner to a political stunt that has no legal authority."

If DFPS does not close out the cases, he expects other families may consider bringing suits to get any investigations against them similarly blocked.


In a statement, Lambda Legal and the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas called the ruling "a win for our clients and the rule of law."

"It would be unconscionable for DFPS to continue these lawless investigations while this lawsuit continues, and we will not stop fighting to protect the safety and lives of transgender youth here in Texas," the statement said.

Paxton also framed this ruling as a win, saying on Twitter that the Texas Supreme Court "green-lighted investigations that lower [Democratic] courts froze."

DFPS spokesman Patrick Crimmins said the agency is reviewing the ruling.

For LGBTQ mental health support, call the Trevor Project's 24/7 toll-free support line at 866-488-7386. You can also reach a trained crisis counselor through the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline by calling 800-273-8255 or texting 741741.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune. Read the original here. /.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at

Latest Headlines


Follow Us