Ex-Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: End Second Amendment

By Susan McFarland
Ex-Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens: End Second Amendment
A student of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School holds a sign Saturday during the March for Our Lives rally in Washington, D.C. Hundreds of thousands rallied in the nation's capital to demand action to end gun violence. Photo by David Tulis/UPI | License Photo

March 27 (UPI) -- Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens weighed in on gun violence in the United States Tuesday, by calling for the end of the Second Amendment -- the guaranteed right to bear arms.

In an op-ed published in The New York Times, Stevens said the students and demonstrators who demonstrated over the weekend should seek a repeal of the controversial constitutional amendment.


"That simple but dramatic action would move Saturday's marchers closer to their objective than any other possible reform," Stevens wrote. "It would eliminate the only legal rule that protects sellers of firearms in the United States -- unlike every other market in the world. It would make our schoolchildren safer than they have been since 2008 and honor the memories of the many, indeed far too many, victims of recent gun violence."

The former justice said the Second Amendment has been misinterpreted for decades and extended beyond its original intent, which was to enable citizens to form militias in the face of potential government tyranny. He said repealing the provision would reduce gun violence.

RELATED March for Our Lives: Students around the country rally against gun violence

Stevens -- a Republican appointed to the bench by President Gerald Ford who served from 1975 until his retirement in 2010 -- referred to his dissent with the high court's opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, a 2008 case that ultimately upheld an individual's right to possess a firearm for home self-defense.

"That decision -- which I remain convinced was wrong and certainly was debatable -- has provided the [National Rifle Association] with a propaganda weapon of immense power," Stevens wrote.

The former justice has received some pushback over his controversial viewpoint.

RELATED Justice Department advances bump stock ban proposal

"You may have been a Supreme Court Justice and I may just be a small voice for freedom but you sir should be ashamed of yourself," NRA television host Grant Stinchfield said. "Your words and ultimate wish list is a disgrace to America."

"Stevens has a right to express his views even though wrong," Senator John Cornyn, R-Texas, tweeted.

Adam Winkler, a UCLA law professor, argued that such a repeal would do little to change U.S. gun laws, especially in states that are resistant to gun control.

RELATED Maryland high school shooter died from self-inflicted gunshot

"The Second Amendment is not a barrier to enacting good gun laws," he wrote. "The NRA is. It's the politics of guns that control our gun laws, not the law of the Second Amendment."

Earlier this month, the Department of Justice announced a series of actions intended to support President Donald Trump's plan to prevent school shootings.

The package of directives focuses on enforcing laws already in place and asks states and other federal agencies to help strengthen the firearm purchase background check system.

Latest Headlines


Follow Us