Advertisement

Republicans trigger 'nuclear option' in SCOTUS showdown

By Eric DuVall
Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch testifies during the third day of his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 22. Minority Democrats launched a filibuster aimed at blocking his confirmation, but Republicans vote to invoke the nuclear option requiring only a simple majority to confirm him. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI
Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch testifies during the third day of his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 22. Minority Democrats launched a filibuster aimed at blocking his confirmation, but Republicans vote to invoke the nuclear option requiring only a simple majority to confirm him. Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo

April 6 (UPI) -- Senate Republicans on Thursday voted to invoke the so-called "nuclear option" to prevent Democrats from filibustering the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

The Senate voted 52-48 along strict party lines to change the rule requiring 60 votes to confirm a Supreme Court nominee. With Thursday's vote, the threshold was lowered to a simple majority.

Advertisement

Gorsuch's final confirmation vote is scheduled for Friday.

Senate Republicans made good on their promise to vote on the the nuclear option after an earlier procedural vote in which Democrats invoked a filibuster in an attempt to block the confirmation of President Donald Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court.

The rule change upends decades of Senate precedent.

Changes to the arcane Senate filibuster have been threatened by both parties during contentious nomination fights in the past. The nuclear option ends the practice of requiring 60 votes to close off debate on a Supreme Court nominee and bring it to an up-or-down vote. The minority party has long leaned on the filibuster as a means of maintaining a foothold in the confirmation process.

Advertisement

The filibuster will remain in place for common legislation.

Until Thursday, neither Democrats nor Republicans have seriously contemplated doing away with the filibuster rules for a Supreme Court seat, the most consequential seat on which senators vote. Previously, when Democrats were in the majority and angered over Republican filibusters of former President Barack Obama's nominees, they outlawed the use of the filibuster for lower court seats and sub-Cabinet posts.

Critics from both sides have argued reducing the threshold for the high court from a bipartisan supermajority of the Senate to a partisan 50-plus-one vote will result in more ideologically extreme nominees.

Gorsuch's nomination is the latest chapter in a 14-month battle over the vacant seat, which was created in February of 2016 when conservative Justice Antonin Scalia died.

Democrats were furious when Obama's nominee to replace Scalia, Judge Merrick Garland, was not granted a confirmation hearing by Republicans. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell gambled a GOP victory in the 2016 presidential election would prevent tipping the balance of the court from a one-vote conservative majority bloc to what would widely be perceived as a 5-4 liberal majority with another Democratic nominee on the bench.

Advertisement

Republicans responded by rallying behind Gorsuch, 49, a relatively young conservative appeals court judge, as qualified for the Supreme Court and uncontroversial.

Latest Headlines