Advertisement

S.F. appeals court to hear arguments on Trump travel ban Tuesday

The announcement came one day after the court denied a government request to immediately reinstate the travel ban.

By Doug G. Ware
Demonstrators jam the international arrivals area at San Francisco International Airport in San Francisco on January 29, 2017. Protesters called for a lifting of the ban on arriving Muslims and lawyers offered legal service to arriving foreign nationals. A federal appeals court in San Francisco announced Monday it will hear arguments for and against President Donald Trump's controversial executive order to temporarily bar entry into the United States for refugees and immigrants. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI
Demonstrators jam the international arrivals area at San Francisco International Airport in San Francisco on January 29, 2017. Protesters called for a lifting of the ban on arriving Muslims and lawyers offered legal service to arriving foreign nationals. A federal appeals court in San Francisco announced Monday it will hear arguments for and against President Donald Trump's controversial executive order to temporarily bar entry into the United States for refugees and immigrants. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo

Feb. 6 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court in San Francisco will hear arguments Tuesday about whether to reinstate President Donald Trump's embattled order to temporarily close U.S. borders to refugees and immigrants.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals announced the hearing on Monday as Trump's administration filed legal briefs there.

Advertisement

The federal court will hear oral arguments in the case by phone on Tuesday, beginning at 6 p.m. EST. Each side will get 30 minutes to argue their position.

The announcement came one day after the appellate court denied a request by the Justice Department to immediately reinstate the executive order, which temporarily bans U.S. entry for all refugees as well as immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

RELATED Sunday: U.S. appeals court denies restoration of Trump travel ban

Now that briefs have been filed by both sides, the court will hear the arguments before making a final decision. The plaintiffs in the case are the states of Washington and Minnesota, which first filed to block Trump's order last week.

The legal moves in San Francisco follow a Seattle judge's ruling on Friday that issued a nationwide injunction against the president's travel ban.

Advertisement

Trump's administration argues that Washington and Minnesota are overstepping their legal authority by bringing the case, and that the president does have full authority to guard national security. Opponents in the battle claim the travel ban would cause irreparable harm on multiple fronts.

Whichever side loses is expected to take their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the San Francisco court refuses to lift the injunction, the case will go back to Seattle for a longer-term judgment on the restraining order.

Latest Headlines