PHOENIX, Aug. 17 (UPI) -- Lawyers say a dispute over the extent of a court-appointed monitor's power is delaying resolution of a suit against Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
A federal judge ordered monitoring of the controversial sheriff's office in December, in a finding that Arpaio was guilty of racial profiling in the detention of ethnic minorities.
The manner in which the monitor will function is one of 11 areas that remain unresolved in negotiations with the American Civil Liberties Union, The Arizona Republic reported Friday.
Tim Casey, the sheriff's attorney, said Arpaio remains opposed to a court-appointed monitor.
While the sheriff was "very receptive and cooperative," Casey said the ACLU's proposal for the monitor to review a deputy's performance was beyond the scope of the judge's order.
"This lawsuit was not about any malfeasance in internal-affairs matters," he said.
Because the sheriff is an elected official, the monitor's power "has to be consistent" with powers granted to the sheriff by the state constitution, the attorney said.
"Unlike a police chief, the monitor cannot have the ultimate veto," Casey added.
The sheriff has rejected an ACLU proposal for an advisory board. Casey said Arpaio fears the board will be used to remove his from office.
Read More
- Hearing to debate possible monitor for controversial Arizona sheriff
- Ariz. Sheriff Arpaio backs down from racial profiling
- Sheriff Arpaio recall effort falls short in Arizona
- Court bans detention practices by Ariz. sheriff against Latinos
- Sheriff Arpaio wants to talk to Hispanics
- Feds drop Arpaio investigation
