WASHINGTON, May 21 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Monday agreed to hear what may be a landmark case on whether targeted groups may challenge the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
A section of the 1978 act allows the U.S. attorney general and the director of national intelligence to jointly authorize the "targeting of [non-U.S.] persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States" to acquire "foreign intelligence information," normally with the special Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's prior approval of targeting and procedures.
The issue is whether a group of organizations that say they are harmed by the provision have standing under the Constitution to file suit in court. The government contends they offered "no evidence that the United States would imminently acquire their international communications using [the section of the act]," or that an injunction "would likely redress their purported injuries."
But a federal appeals court in New York ruled otherwise, saying the groups had standing to file.
Related
- Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Justices will decide the fate of gay marriage
- High court refuses Puerto Rico voting case
- High court says farmers must pay bankruptcy tax
- Under the U.S. Supreme Court: 2012 election drowning in secret money
- Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Opening the gate to criminal alien appeals
- Poll: Approval of U.S. Supreme Court slips
- High court allows Ryan appeal to proceed
- High court to look at pre-Padilla deportations
- Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Affirmative action headin' for a Texas showdown
- High court hears Arizona immigration case
"The plaintiffs' uncontroverted testimony that they fear their sensitive international electronic communications [are] being monitored and that they have taken costly measures to avoid being monitored -- because we deem that fear and those actions to be reasonable in the circumstances of this case -- establishes injuries in fact," the appeals court said, "that we find are causally linked to the allegedly unconstitutional [FISA Amendments Act]. We therefore find that plaintiffs have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the [act] in federal court."
The groups include Amnesty International USA, the Global Fund for Women, Global Rights, Human Rights Watch, International Criminal Defence Attorneys Association, The Nation Magazine, PEN American Center, Service Employees International Union, the Washington Office on Latin America and several individuals.
The Supreme Court accepted the case without comment. Argument should be held next term.
