Sections
Log in
Top News
U.S. News World News Featured Voices
Odd News
Entertainment
Movies Music TV
Sports
Soccer NFL NBA MLB
Photos
News Entertainment Sports Features
More...
Defense Featured Science Health Video Archive Almanac
About Feedback Privacy Policy
About Feedback Privacy Policy
Search
Trending
BPA
Impeachment
Bernie Sanders
Pensacola shooting
Blueberries
Coyote killing
NYPD
Helicopter crash
Missing sailor
Michael Bloomberg
U.S. News
April 8, 2012 / 4:28 AM

Under the Supreme Court: High court agrees to consider corporate free speech post-Citizen United

By
NICOLE DEBEVEC, United Press International
UPI/Kevin Dietsch | License Photo

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider taking another bite of the corporate political free speech apple recently, accepting a petition asking justices to summarily overturn a Montana Supreme Court decision petitioners say flies in the face of Citizens United.

In upholding a ban on corporate independent expenditures in state elections, the Montana justices determined that "unlike Citizens United, this case concerns Montana law, Montana elections and it arises from Montana history."

That ruling, the petition said, raises the question for the U.S. Supreme Court to consider: "Whether Montana is bound by the holding of Citizens United, that a ban on corporate independent political expenditures is a violation of the First Amendment, when the ban applies to state, rather than federal, elections."

Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission is the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision two years ago that effectively ended the restrictions on political contributions from the general funds of corporations and unions.

RELATED Ginsburg, Breyer: Rethink Citizens United

In asking for a summary judgment, the petition (American Tradition Partnership, et al., vs. Bullock, et al.) by two Montana corporations said the state's top court was wrong in its reasoning about the origin of the flow of the vast sums of money pouring into election campaigns, among other things. The money isn't coming from corporations, but people, the petition argued, and people have been free to spend pretty much as they see fit since 1976.

"The core holding of Citizens United," the petition argued, "is that the independence of independent expenditures means that they pose no cognizable quid-pro-quo corruption risk and no other cognizable governmental interest justifies banning corporate independent expenditures. Thus, the Montana Supreme Court's decision constitutes an attempt to force the reconsideration of Citizens United simply because it disagrees with the opinion.

"That effort should be rejected summarily."

RELATED Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Son of Bush vs. Gore

In March, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer argued the Montana case would give the Supreme Court a chance to rethink Citizens United.

"A petition for certiorari will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway," the statement said.

Ginsburg and Breyer said in their statement lower courts were still bound by the 2010 ruling that freed corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they wished on campaigns if they did so independently of candidates. The court put on hold the state court ruling upholding a Montana law similar to the federal law nullified in Citizens United, at least until an appeal is decided.

RELATED Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Will funny money elect the next president?

Most of the money spent in this election cycle is by the so-called "Super PACs," political action committees formed to make independent expenditures promoting or opposing a certain candidate and that have gained great traction and appeal since Citizen United was handed down.

In their petition, the corporations said the Montana decision was in conflict with the Supreme Court's Citizens United holding that corporations could not be banned from doing core political speech and the Court's reasoning that the independence of such speech (through super PACs) eliminated risk of corrupting candidates.

A lower court in Montana relied on Citizens United in declaring the Corrupt Practices Act unconstitutional, but the state's Supreme Court overturned that decision Dec. 30, ruling the U.S. Supreme Court campaign spending decision didn't conflict with the state's law because it was federal, not state.

RELATED Under the U.S. Supreme Court: The incredible shrinking McCain-Feingold act

James Bopp Jr. of The Bopp Law Firm in Terre Haute, Ind., and lead counsel for the corporations, said, "If Montana can ban core political speech because of Montana's unique characteristics, free speech will be seriously harmed."

He said speakers would be silenced because of corrupt activities more than 100 years ago or because Montana candidates typically don't spend much on their campaigns, Legal Newsline said.

In its petition, the corporations said reconsidering Citizens United "based on the facts proposed for limiting core political speech would pose grave constitutional dangers to free speech and association," the petition read. "Consequently, summary reversal is appropriate."

RELATED Court rejects challenge to PAC law

In the filing, Bopp urges the Court to overturn Montana's ban and to reverse the ruling by the state Supreme Court that upheld it, the state's Corrupt Practices Act, which bars corporate contributions in state political campaigns.

Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock expressed mixed feelings about the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to stay the Montana law.

"At the end of the day, the Citizens United decision dealt with a completely different electoral system -- the federal elections and federal laws," he said on MSNBC. "But the vast majority of elections are at the state and local level."

"There are real differences there," he said. "That's what we pushed, and I think that the court would recognize that."

Just last week, Democracy for America said it began a new campaign designed to take apart the Citizens United decision by taking on the ruling through the court system and highlighting Bullock's case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The advocacy group's campaign calls on attorneys general from across the United States to sign onto an amicus brief -- or friend-of-the-court brief -- documenting the need to overturn the 2010 Supreme Court decision, Democracy for America said in a release.

"Citizens United corrupts our democratic process," said Jim Dean, the organization's chairman. "This campaign, courageously headed by Montana's Attorney General Steve Bullock, demands that the Supreme Court address [its] decision that allowed undisclosed amounts of money to flow into our electoral process. Corporations are not people and ordinary citizens should not be drowned out of democracy."

Adam Skaggs, senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University's School of Law, also argued for the Supreme Court to uphold Montana's ban, saying the matter before it gives the justices a chance to review the "real-world consequences" of Citizens United and "the devastating effect it has had on our democracy," Legal Newsline said.

"The Montana Supreme Court was right to uphold the state's law banning corporate money in elections. The state's experience with corruption, and the flood of super PAC spending today, makes clear that corporate spending in elections can give rise to the appearance and reality of corruption," Skaggs said in a statement.

However, the petitioners said Citizens United hasn't been burdensome.

"Citizens United has not proven unworkable, as evidenced by those who have exercised their liberty under it," the petition said. "Lower courts, except for the [Montana Supreme Court], have uniformly followed this court's holding, and legislatures and government agencies, with few exceptions, have implemented the protections of Citizens United."

Perhaps the most notable objection to the ruling was President Obama's comments during the 2010 State of the Union address, when he remarked, "With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections."

More recently, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., co-sponsor of legislation that limited how much individuals could contribute to political campaigns, predicted "major scandals" would be the result of the more prominent role of super PACS that Citizen United allowed to foster, The Hill reported.

"What the Supreme Court did is a combination of arrogance, naivete and stupidity the likes of which I have never seen," McCain said. "I promise you, there will be huge scandals because there's too much money washing around, too much of it we don't know who's behind it and too much corruption associated with that kind of money."

  • Topics
  • Stephen Breyer
  • James Bopp
  • John McCain
  • Barack Obama

Latest Headlines

Supreme Court temporarily blocks subpoena seeking Trump records from Deutsche Bank, Capital One
U.S. News // 3 hours ago
Supreme Court temporarily blocks subpoena seeking Trump records from Deutsche Bank, Capital One
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court on Friday granted President Donald Trump a temporary stay in his request to block a subpoena requiring two financial institutions to hand over his records to House Democrats.

Jury sides with Elon Musk in 'pedo guy' trial
U.S. News // 4 hours ago
Jury sides with Elon Musk in 'pedo guy' trial
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- A Los Angeles jury on Friday determined businessman Elon Musk didn't defame a British diver in 2018 when he called the man a "pedo guy" amid a row over the rescue of 12 boys and their coach trapped in a Thai cave.

Flash freeze to shock Midwest after another dose of snow
U.S. News // 5 hours ago
Flash freeze to shock Midwest after another dose of snow
Midwesterners may have a tough time deciphering exactly which season we're in come this weekend and next week -- and forecasters stress that rapid weather changes may be dizzying.

Jane Fonda leads 9th climate change protest in Washington, D.C.
U.S. News // 10 hours ago
Jane Fonda leads 9th climate change protest in Washington, D.C.
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- Academy Award-winning actress Jane Fonda held her ninth consecutive Fire Drill on Friday to protest climate change.

White House refuses judiciary's invite to participate in impeachment probe
U.S. News // 5 hours ago
White House refuses judiciary's invite to participate in impeachment probe
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- The White House notified the House judiciary committee on Friday it won't participate with the panel's impeachment investigation into President Donald Trump.

Gunman who killed 3 at Florida Navy base was Saudi aviation student
U.S. News // 14 hours ago
Gunman who killed 3 at Florida Navy base was Saudi aviation student
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- A gunman who shot several people at a U.S. naval base in Pensacola, Fla., on Friday, killing three, was a Saudi aviation trainee, local officials said.

6 Mass. vaping illness patients bought products at legal pot shops, health board says
U.S. News // 10 hours ago
6 Mass. vaping illness patients bought products at legal pot shops, health board says
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- Six Massachusetts patients with vaping-related illness told doctors they bought regulated THC e-cigarette products at state-licensed marijuana shops, according to information posted by state public health officials.

Ford recalls F-250, F-350, F-450 trucks for faulty tailgate latch
U.S. News // 9 hours ago
Ford recalls F-250, F-350, F-450 trucks for faulty tailgate latch
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- Ford Motor Co. announced a recall Friday of 231,664 heavy-duty pickup trucks to check for unintended opening of tailgates caused by a faulty latch release.

2020 hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren 'very healthy,' medical report says
U.S. News // 9 hours ago
2020 hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren 'very healthy,' medical report says
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- Democratic presidential hopeful and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren is in good physical health for her age of 70, her physician said in a medical report Friday.

North Carolina GOP Rep. George Holding to leave House after 2020
U.S. News // 10 hours ago
North Carolina GOP Rep. George Holding to leave House after 2020
Dec. 6 (UPI) -- Rep. George Holding, a North Carolina Republican who saw his district change to mainly Democrat-leaning voters after a new congressional map was drawn up, said Friday he won't run to keep his House seat next year.

Trending Stories

West Virginia corrections workers suspended over 'disturbing' photo
Michael Bloomberg unveils sweeping gun control platform
Michael Bloomberg unveils sweeping gun control platform
Gunman who killed 3 at Florida Navy base was Saudi aviation student
Gunman who killed 3 at Florida Navy base was Saudi aviation student
Maine's wild blueberry growers hurting without trade assistance
Maine's wild blueberry growers hurting without trade assistance
Indian police fatally shoot 4 men accused of gang rape, murder of woman
Indian police fatally shoot 4 men accused of gang rape, murder of woman

Photo Gallery

 
Moments from the 15th UNICEF Snowflake Ball
Moments from the 15th UNICEF Snowflake Ball

Latest News

TE Jack Doyle signs three-year, $21M extension with Indianapolis Colts
Kansas City Chiefs' Damien Williams ruled out vs. New England Patriots
Penn State, head football coach James Franklin agree to six-year extension
Portland Trail Blazers make Carmelo Anthony's contract fully guaranteed
Supreme Court temporarily blocks subpoena seeking Trump records from Deutsche Bank, Capital One
 
Back to Article
/
Back to top
About UPI Contact Feedback Advertisements Submit News Tips
Copyright © 2019 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of UsePrivacy Policy