Advertisement

Italy's deadly earthquake reflects a history of destruction

By Brendan Duffy, Mark Quigley and Mike Sandiford, University of Melbourne
General tectonic setting of Italy, showing seismicity over the past 10 years from the USGS catalogue. Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
General tectonic setting of Italy, showing seismicity over the past 10 years from the USGS catalogue. Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey

The Appenines region of central Italy has been struck by a deadly earthquake, with a magnitude of 6.2. The quake, which had an epicenter roughly six miles southeast of Norcia, Italy, occurred just over seven years after the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake that killed more than 300 people only 56 miles away.

Advertisement

The latest earthquake occurred at 3:36 a.m. local time. The number of fatalities at time of writing exceeds 30. Buildings have collapsed in nearby Amatrice and residents are reportedly trapped in rubble.

Fracture zone

RELATED Magnitude 6.2 earthquake strikes central Italy

This earthquake is no surprise. Italy is prone to earthquakes; it sits above the boundary of the African and European plates. The oceanic crust of the African plate is subducting (sinking) under Italy, creating iconic natural features such as the volcano at Mount Vesuvius. These plates are converging at a rate of around 5 millimeters each year.

Advertisement

Both the L'Aquila and Norcia earthquakes were located below the central Appenines, which form the mountainous spine of Italy.

The Earth's crust under the Appenines of central and western Italy is extending; eastern central Italy is moving to the northeast relative to Rome. As a result, this region experiences normal faulting: where one part of the earth subsides relative to another as the crust is stretched.

The fault systems in the central Appenines are short and structurally complex, so the earthquakes are not large by global standards, the largest almost invariably hover around magnitude 6.8 to 7.0. But because the quakes are shallow and structurally complex, and because many of the local towns and cities contain vulnerable buildings, strong shaking from these earthquakes has the potential to inflict major damage and loss of life in urban areas.

This region also seems to be particularly prone to earthquake clustering, whereby periods of relative quiet are interrupted by several strong earthquakes over weeks to decades.

A history of quakes

Both Norcia and L'Aquila feature prominently at either end of a zone of large Appenine earthquakes. This zone has produced many strong earthquakes. The latest Norcia earthquake occurred only around 56 miles northwest of the L'Aquila earthquake and very close to the epicentre of the 1979 Norcia earthquake, which had a magnitude of 5.9.

Advertisement

But the area's earthquake history can be traced back over seven centuries. During this period, this region has been hit by at least six earthquakes that have caused very strong to severe shaking. Amatrice, so badly damaged in the most recent quake, was severely damaged in 1639. A few decades later, in 1703, roughly 10,000 people were killed in Norcia, Montereale, L'Aquila and the surrounding Appenine region in three magnitude 6.2-6.7 earthquakes.

Parts of Norcia were subsequently built upon the surface rupture created in the 1703 earthquake. Another earthquake in 1997 killed 11 people.

In this most recent event, an estimated 13,000 people would have experienced severe ground shaking, probably lasting 10-20 seconds.

The estimated damage of this latest earthquake will almost inevitably exceed $100 million, and may top $1 billion. Amatrice appears to be among the populated areas that were most severely affected.

What lies ahead?

The region now faces a prolonged and energetic aftershock sequence; over the first 2.5 hours following the mainshock, at least four earthquakes of around magnitude 4.5 were recorded in the region by the U.S. Geological Survey. More than 10,000 aftershocks were recorded following the L'Aquila earthquake in 2009.

RELATED San Andreas fault is about to crack – here's what will happen when it does

We note that within the region, there is excellent and continuously improving scientific information about the hazard. But the knowledge of the hazard has not always translated well into measures that directly reduce economic loss and fatalities in earthquakes.

Advertisement

Following the L'Aquila earthquake, six scientists were convicted of manslaughter for failing to inform the public adequately of the earthquake risk. Although the charges were subsequently dropped, this marked a major development in the way blame is apportioned after large natural events, particularly with regard to effective hazard communication.

Numerous vulnerable buildings remain, and the recovery process is commonly plagued by long disruptions and inadequate government funding to recover rapidly. Both the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake and this most recent quake highlight just how important it is to translate hazard assessments into improving the resilience of infrastructure to strong shaking. The focus should remain on linking science, engineering and policy; this is often the biggest challenge globally.

The Conversation

Brendan Duffy is a lecturer in applied geoscience at theUniversity of Melbourne; Mark Quigley is an associate professor at the University of Melbourne and Mike Sandiford is chair of geology & Redmond Barry Distinguished Professor at the University of Melbourne

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Latest Headlines