Think tanks wrap-up III

Jan. 9, 2003 at 6:33 PM
share with facebook
share with twitter

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 (UPI) -- The UPI think tank wrap-up is a daily digest covering opinion pieces, reactions to recent news events and position statements released by various think tanks. This is the third of three wrap-ups for Jan. 9.


The Nixon Center/The National Interest

(The Nixon Center is a public policy institution that is a substantively and programmatically independent division of The Richard Nixon Library & Birthplace Foundation in Yorba Linda, Calif. The National Interest magazine is published quarterly by The National Interest Inc., a non-profit partnership of Hollinger International Inc. and The Nixon Center.)

WASHINGTON -- Chechnya, terrorism and U. S. security interests

by Ariel Cohen

The ripple effect of the October Chechen terrorist act in a Moscow theater -- when nearly 1,000 people were taken hostage by radical Chechen insurgents -- is deep and long term. Russia stepped up rhetoric regarding extraterritorial use of force against terrorists, their supporters, and funders, such as those rich individuals in the Gulf states who allegedly ordered the Chechens to shoot a "snuff" movie in the theater.

Azerbaijan drew immediate conclusions and shut down a Chechen representative office in Baku. Georgian politicians remain nervous that Russian troops may pour over the border and into the Pankisi Gorge. U.S. State Department officials in charge of Caucasus policy are concerned that a sweeping Russian operation in the Pankisi Gorge or elsewhere in Georgia could further undermine Georgian sovereignty. Such a campaign would deal a blow to the already weakened President Eduard Shevardnadze, although for now he seems to have acquiesced to Vladimir Putin's pressure.

After the October attack and the more recent suicide bombing at the headquarters of the Moscow-backed Chechen government, chances for a future settlement in Chechnya seem grim, and the emergence of an independent Chechen state, or even a para-state, less likely than before.

If the fighting stopped tomorrow, the challenges to the viability of a Chechen entity are towering. After the 1996 Russian troop withdrawal, organized crime and Islamic militants have turned Chechnya into a haven for kidnappers-for-ransom, slave traders, and murderers of nuns and foreign aid workers.

President Maskhadov was pushed by Shamil Basaev into adopting repressive Sharia laws. Sources in the U.S. State Department said that Maskhadov failed to prevent over $100 million from being funneled to Chechnya by radical Islamist networks. He could not forestall the invasion of Dagestan in July 1999 led by Basaev and Khattab, an invasion that ended Chechnya's de-facto independence and propelled Vladimir Putin to power.

According to the State Department, today Maskhadov is hardly a proper partner to negotiate peace with the Russians, while radical Chechen groups may end up on the U.S. terrorism watch list, further losing their legitimacy -- an even greater likelihood as further revelations detail the links between radical Chechens and terrorist organizations in the Middle East.

The October attack in Moscow has put a higher political risk premium on energy investments in Russia and the Caspian region. The peace settlement in Chechnya has suffered a severe blow. Today it hinges on what kind of an entity this proposed state could become: a "Caliphate" run by terrorists, with an educational system that brainwashes its youth to kill "sinners" and infidels, or a nascent democracy with a love of secular education and the arts, such as the Chechens have been capable of in the past.

In the recent past, the rhetoric about creation of a Chechen-led Caliphate "from sea to shining sea" i.e., from the Black Sea to the Caspian, created panic among the leaders in Russia, Dagestan, Azerbaijan and Georgia. A radical and impoverished Islamist state in Europe, on the doorstep of Russia and the weak South Caucasus states, would unquestionably be dangerous. It will act as a destabilizing factor, and scare off the very investors who otherwise could improve the lives of millions of people in the region.

Will the Chechens be able to break the ties to global terrorist Islamic networks and to the funders of mayhem in the Gulf, in "Londonistan," and elsewhere? Will they be ready to disarm in order to assuage their neighbors' fears? Will Russia and the West be capable of providing a massive humanitarian package for refugee resettlement and rebuilding?

Neither the Maskhadov organization nor the Russian government is equal to the task, as the history of previous Russian assistance to Chechnya has demonstrated. The aid funds budgeted during the post 1996 period for reconstruction were stolen, and the culprits never apprehended.

The United States is facing a deteriorating security situation in the Caucasus and beyond, which may increase the threat of the use of weapons of mass destruction, or weapons of mass destruction. To help avert such terrorism, the United States should expand anti-terrorism and security cooperation with Russia, bilaterally and through the NATO-Russia Council established in May, and with other Eurasian states. The United States should expand anti-terrorism and security cooperation with countries in the region and with the business community; undertake a security audit of major possible targets; encourage higher levels of protection of weapons of mass destruction storage sites and energy facilities.

Washington should offer Russian forces anti-terrorism training and cooperation in hostage rescue operations, and expand contacts between security services protecting weapons of mass destruction sites. The U.S. intelligence community should develop cooperation aimed at intercepting Chechen terrorist funding and operational support from outside Russia. Cooperate with Russia to facilitate the extradition of Chechen terrorist leaders from the Persian Gulf havens.

The United States should also assist Russia in finding Chechen partners for negotiations while isolating Islamist radicals. Washington should recommend, as President Bush did in the recent summit meeting with Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg, that moderate representatives of the separatists and the Russian government enter into negotiations that can produce a settlement while preserving Russia's territorial integrity. The Islamist wing of the Chechen rebels, however, should be excluded from the negotiation process.

Moreover, the Chechen separatists interested in a negotiated settlement must break their ties to global Islamic terrorist networks. Those who maintain such ties should be put on the U.S. State Department terrorism watch list.

Finally, the United States should take the lead in working with its partners in the European Union and among the Muslim nations, as well as with the Russian government, to put forward a massive humanitarian package for refugee resettlement and rebuilding in Chechnya if peace is achieved.

It is time for the United States to face up to the deteriorating security situation in the Caucasus and beyond. The brutality of the Moscow hostage taking, its undeniable ties to the same enemy the United States is fighting, and the necessity for Russian support in the global war against radical Islamic terrorism and a possible war against Saddam Hussein, dictate a closer cooperation.

(Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., is a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation and the author of "Russian Imperialism: Development and Crisis.")


WASHINGTON -- Europe After Copenhagen: Some Brief Observations

by Radek Sikorski

The enlargement of the European Union -- incorporating 10 new states, applicants largely from post-Communist Europe -- is the most important geostrategic event since the terrorist attacks on the United States on Sept. 11, 2001. Unlike the latter, however, it is mostly a benign process -- yet its impact on global affairs should not be underestimated.

First and foremost, when the latest enlargement round is completed, the European Union will be more populous, have a bigger market and possess an overall higher total gross domestic product than the United States.

The EU's eastward expansion also means that the countries of the Balkans, as well as Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, will feel the increased "civilizational" pull of the West. The consolidation of the EU's eastward flank will strengthen civil society and democratic tendencies in all of those countries.

However, the impact of expansion on the existing members of the EU should also not be discounted. Inflexible labor regulations in Western Europe, for example, will be undermined by competition from migrant workers and by capital flight to the east to take advantage of a cheaper skilled labor base. The expansion of the EU will also oblige France and Germany, the EU's central powers, to operate more democratically.

On the downside, a complete failure to tackle the ludicrous Common Agricultural Policy at Copenhagen, leading to its ossification for many years into the future, ensures ongoing trade frictions with the United States and between the developed West as a whole with the rest of the world.

With enlargement, the EU will now have a plausible claim to speaking for the entire continent, and the sense of its weight will grow. Spurred by both their own anti-Americanism and patronizing talk from Washington, Europeans might develop a continent-wide nationalism that will one day frustrate American policymakers more than today's impotence.

Yet, before Washington is rocked by predictions of a coming clash with Europe, the United States should remember that EU enlargement was inspired by America's decision to enlarge NATO. New and future EU members have first been integrated into the Euro-Atlantic world because of the efforts undertaken by the United States.

Indeed, a new pro-American constituency may develop within the European Union among the ranks of the "easterners." Therefore, it makes sense for the United States, in order to retain and gain further influence, to continue to advocate the inclusion of countries to the east of the enlarged EU.

(Radek Sikorsk, who has served as Poland's deputy minister for defense and for foreign affairs, is currently executive director of the New Atlantic Initiative and resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.)

Related UPI Stories
Trending Stories
Photos