Advertisement

Bush move on ports draws mixed reaction

By CHRIS H. SIEROTY

WASHINGTON, Oct. 9 (UPI) -- President George W. Bush's decision on Tuesday to ask a federal court to reopen West Coast ports -- a request that was granted later in the day -- was greeted with anger from labor unions but was cheered by struggling retailers.

A federal judge in San Francisco imposed an 80-day cooling-off period that ends a 10-day lockout.

Advertisement

The National Retail Federation praised Bush's decision, saying he had shown "political courage and leadership," while the United Auto Workers called federal intervention in labor disputes a "bad idea."

The AFL-CIO described the decision as a "tragedy with historic ramifications."

"It's an especially bad idea when carried out by a president who has tried repeatedly to limit -- and even eliminate -- the right of workers to join unions and bargain collectively," said Ron Gettelfinger, president of the UAW.

Advertisement

He added that the fact that a presidential panel was appointed Monday to investigate a complex labor dispute and released its findings Tuesday "does nothing to enhance the Bush administration's credibility as a truly neutral arbitrator in the matter."

"Dockworkers are legitimately concerned that the White House is preparing to team up with the Pacific Maritime Association to impose a settlement on the employers' terms," said Gettelfinger.

In a hastily arranged announcement outside the Oval Office, the president cited national economic health and safety as his reasons to impose the Taft-Hartley Act for the first time in a quarter-century. In 1978, President Jimmy Carter implemented the act in a coal miners' strike, but the court declined to issue the order. A court injunction was later obtained instead.

The decision directed U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft to seek a federal court order to put longshoremen back to work for 80 days while mediators try to resolve the dispute between the International Longshoremen and Warehouse Union and the PMA.

The PMA locked out the union on Sept. 29 after employers claimed longshoremen were staging a "go-slow" labor action. The union denied the accusation. The contract between the ILWU and PMA expired in July, but both sides have been operating under short-term agreements. The PMA said the extension would not have kept the workers from engaging in a work slowdown. It said it would call union workers to report to duty early Wednesday.

Advertisement

In papers filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco Tuesday, the Justice Department said an injunction should be granted because "the president of the United States has determined that the labor standoff between the defendants has resulted in a lockout that affects a substantial part of the maritime industry."

In a statement, the National Retail Federation said the dispute between the ILWU and the PMA had led to hundreds of ships carrying hundreds of thousands of containers of merchandise just sitting in 29 idled ports in California, Oregon and Washington.

"This is about more than labor unions and port operators," said Tracy Mullin, NRF's president and chief executive officer. "This is about whether American children will find presents under the tree on Christmas morning."

The cooling-off period will keep the ports open during the critical Christmas season, when U.S. retailers rely on imported goods to stock their shelves.

However, even if the dockworkers go back to work on Wednesday, both sides agree that it's going to take four to six weeks to move the merchandise from the docks to the stores.

"If this shutdown is allowed to continue, we could face serious shortages of popular items," Mullin said.

Advertisement

"The president has shown political courage and leadership. He has put national security and the economy first."

A wide variety of consumer products that are imported from Asia via the West Coast have been affected by the shutdown, especially toys, consumer electronics, shoes, clothing and housewares.

A University of California at Berkeley study has estimated the cost of the port shutdown to the U.S. economy at $1 billion a day.

"This is the first time in the history of the United States that a president has let an employer lock out workers in an extended quest to undermine the workers' union -- creating a phony crisis -- and then reward that employer's action with government intervention," said AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka. "It is a tragedy with historic ramifications."

The Bush administration denied Tuesday that it had taken sides in the dispute.

Latest Headlines