Advertisement

Cristiano Ronaldo rape lawsuit dismissed by federal judge

Cristiano Ronaldo rape lawsuit dismissed by federal judge
Manchester United's Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates after scoring the 3-2 lead during the UEFA Champions League group F soccer match between Manchester United and Atalanta BC in Manchester, Britain, in October 2021. File Photo by Peter Powell/EPA-EFE

June 11 (UPI) -- A civil lawsuit filed against Cristiano Ronaldo claiming the Portuguese soccer star raped a woman in a hotel room in Las Vegas in 2009 has been dismissed by a federal judge in Nevada.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey in Las Vegas dismissed Kathryn Mayorga's case with prejudice because of the "bad faith conduct" of her lawyer, meaning that she will not be able to refile another complaint.

Advertisement

Mayorga claimed Ronaldo, a forward for Manchester United and captain of Portugal's national team, "sodomized" her in a penthouse suite at the Palms Casino Resort after partying at the Rain Nightclub, according to court documents obtained by United Press International. He has repeatedly said the two had sex but that it was consensual.

Ronaldo and Mayorga reached a $375,000 settlement out-of-court in 2010 which required her to sign a non-disclosure agreement. Mayorga filed the official lawsuit in 2018 seeking further damages in a state court and it moved to a federal court in 2019.

RELATED N.Y. judge dismisses NRA's claim that state investigation was 'witch hunt'

Her lawsuit largely hinged on documents first leaked by a website called "Football Leaks" to the German newspaper Der Spiegel in 2017, which revealed the 2009 sexual assault allegations made by Mayorga.

Advertisement

Mayorga's attorney Leslie Mark Stovall started searching for the documents reported by Der Spiegel on her behalf and contacted Rui Pinto, the man behind Football Leaks. Pinto provided Stovall with the documents.

"Initially brought in an attempt to unwind a 2010 confidential settlement agreement, this case has devolved into a clash over the [Mayorga's] procurement and use of the [Ronaldo's] cyberhacked attorney-client privileged documents to revive long-since-released claims," Dorsey wrote in her opinion.

RELATED Rudy Giuliani faces disciplinary case from D.C. Bar for election fraud lies

Dorsey wrote emails included in the leaked documents were "emblazoned with notices that their contents contain attorney-client communications and attorney work product."

"The procurement and continued use of these documents was bad faith, and simply disqualifying Stovall will not cure the prejudice to Ronaldo because the misappropriated documents and their confidential contents have been woven into the very fabric of Mayorga's claims," the opinion reads.

Dorsey wrote that she recognized "the gravity of this sanction" and imposed it "reluctantly."

RELATED Judge blocks Texas investigations into gender-affirming care for trans kids

Mayorga had a rape kit performed at a local hospital and went to the police in Las Vegas after the encounter but the investigation was dropped because she would not identify a suspect.

The case was reopened by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department after the leaks to Der Spiegel but prosecutors ultimately decided not to file charges against Ronaldo.

Advertisement

Latest Headlines

Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us

Advertisement