Advertisement

Justices reject NFL suspension dispute

The Supreme Court Justices of the United States sit for a formal group photo in the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court in Washington on October 8, 2010. The Justices are (front row from left) Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John G. Roberts (Chief Justice), Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg; (back row from left) Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Sameul Alito and Elena Kagan, the newest member of the Court. UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg
The Supreme Court Justices of the United States sit for a formal group photo in the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court in Washington on October 8, 2010. The Justices are (front row from left) Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John G. Roberts (Chief Justice), Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg; (back row from left) Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Sameul Alito and Elena Kagan, the newest member of the Court. UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg | License Photo

WASHINGTON, Nov. 8 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Monday refused to review a suspension dispute between two players and the National Football League.

The rejection means a state suit filed by the players can continue.

Advertisement

Kevin Williams and Pat Williams, no relation but both Minnesota Vikings, were suspended for four games after a test showed they had used a banned diuretic shown to mask steroid use, CNN reported.

A federal appeals court dismissed a federal court challenge to the suspensions, but allowed a parallel state court suit to continue.

The NFL had asked the Supreme Court to throw out the state suit.

CNN said the NFL cited the National Labor Relations Act, arguing its collective bargaining agreement with the players union keeps its drug policy from being challenged in state courts. The players argued the NFL violated state labor laws.

Latest Headlines