Advertisement

Fossil fuels not the only source of deadly air pollution, study says

By HealthDay News
Fossil fuels not the only source of deadly air pollution, study says
Roughly half of fine particulate matter air pollution is linked to the burning of fossil fuels, but researchers say the rest comes from places people don't expect -- including animal agriculture and construction. Photo by Shutterbug75/Pixabay

Burning fossil fuels account for about 100,000 air pollution-related deaths in the United States each year -- but there are other less obvious sources of deadly air pollution, a new study warns.

"People usually think of power plants and cars, but nowadays, livestock and wood stoves are as big of a problem. It's also our farms and our homes," said Sumil Thakrar, a postdoctoral researcher in the University of Minnesota.

Advertisement

Thakrar and his colleagues also found that while government regulations have led to reduced pollution from electricity production and transportation, other sources have received less attention, including agriculture and residential buildings.

The researchers focused on a particularly dangerous type of air pollution called fine particulate matter -- PM2.5 -- which is associated with heart attack, stroke, lung cancer and other diseases.

RELATED Thunderstorms linked to 3,000 ER visits a year in seniors with asthma, COPD

Their analysis of national data showed that about half of all PM2.5 air pollution-related deaths are from burning fossil fuels, with the remaining largely from animal agriculture, dust from construction and roads, and burning wood for heating and cooking.

The researchers said most people know soot causes PM2.5. But other contributors include ammonia, which is released from animal manure and crop fertilization, they noted.

Advertisement

"Essentially we're asking, 'What's killing people and how do we stop it?'" Thakrar said in a university news release. "The first step in reducing deaths is learning the impact of each and every emission source."

RELATED Pollution disparities can be seen from space

Jason Hill is a professor in the university's Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering. He said targeting particularly damaging pollution sources is a more efficient and likely more effective way of regulating air quality.

"Think of springing a leak in your boat while out fishing. Why fret too much about how much water is coming in when what you really should be doing is plugging the hole?" Hill said in the release.

The study was published recently in the journal Environmental Science and Technology Letters.

RELATED Even as air pollution declines, disparities in exposure remain

More information

The World Health Organization has more on air pollution and health.

Copyright 2020 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Latest Headlines

Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us

Advertisement