"They go about advertising the unique concept of Kit Kat, but I'm so disappointed by what I have purchased," Ahmad, a law student at Kings College London said. "Clearly, if I wanted to purchase a confectionery item that is purely chocolate, I would have purchased a bar of Galaxy."
Ahmad purchased the package of chocolate for $2.88 and cited a case law from the 1930's as a ground for her case.
While she admitted that wafer-less Kit Kats are not a particularly uncommon occurrence, after finding many forums dedicated to the subject, she stated she would actively pursue compensation from the company.
"I wouldn't rule out taking this further if Nestle do not apologize or compensate me adequately," she said.