Advertisement

Paired technology easily monitors, detects atrial fibrillation

By Allen Cone
A mobile heart monitor called KardiaMobile and a smartphone or tablet app can detect atrial fibrillation effectively and easily, according to a study. Photo courtesy of AliveCar
A mobile heart monitor called KardiaMobile and a smartphone or tablet app can detect atrial fibrillation effectively and easily, according to a study. Photo courtesy of AliveCar

Aug. 22 (UPI) -- The advent of new technology -- pairing a mobile heart monitor and smart device app -- can detect atrial fibrillation in a more simplified manner, according to research.

Scienists studied the benefits of the smartphone monitor system, which is supported by an automated algorithm. Their findings, which were the first independent validation of the system in a clinical setting, compared it with simultaneous 12-lead ECGs and were published Tuesday in the journal HeartRhythm.

Advertisement

Atrial fibrillation, an irregular and often rapid heart rate, can increase the risk of stroke, heart failure and other heart-related complications.

"The ability to record your own rhythm strip and directly visualize it and share it with your physician was fictional up until a few years ago," lead investigator Dr. Khaldoun G. Tarakji, of the Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, said in a press release. "We live in an exciting era in which technology is evolving at an unprecedented pace."

Advertisement

Before the new technology, monitoring was cumbersome, limited in duration and invasive, and often required a trip to the doctor's office.

The Kardia Mobile Cardiac Monitor, which is manufactured by AliveCar, works by placing your fingers on two electrodes. It is hooked up to a smart device, enabling patients to record a 30-second rhythm strip. The KardiaMobile sells for $99, and a wearable device called KardiaBand costs $199.

For the study, researchers tested 52 patients with a median age of 68.

They ran the data from the devices through KMCM's automated rhythm analysis, which uses an algorithm specifically developed to detect AF. They compared it with the traditional 12-lead ECG recording analyzed by a doctor.

The researchers found the new technology had 96.6 percent sensitivity rate and 94.1 percent specificity for AF detection compared with physician-interpreted ECGs. Physician-interpreted KMCM recordings had 100 percent sensitivity and 89.2 percent specificity for AF detection compared with physician-interpreted ECGs,

The false negative detection rate was 3.4 percent although the automated system failed to classify some of the results as "Normal" or "Possible AF."

They found that the majority of these "unclassified" readings fell outside the predefined bounds for the algorithm -- less than 30 seconds in duration, the heart rate recorded was under 50 beats per minute or over 100 bpm, or that there was too much noise during the test.

Advertisement

"Given the predefined algorithm operating parameters and high rate of 'unclassified' recordings with resultant missed AF instances, this smartphone monitor's algorithm is not suited to be a replacement for physician analysis," Tarakji said. "However, given its highly accurate performance when able to provide an interpretation, it holds potential as an adjunct to clinical decision making."

Tarakji noted the new technology is beneficial but the products need to be thoroughly tested.

"As a medical community, we have a duty to test these products, assess their accuracy, and more importantly, examine their ability to change outcomes," he said. "Abundance of data could become noise if it does not come with guidance about proper management of the information. Our obligation through proper clinical studies is to provide guidance about the best use of these tools."

How to record a clean EKG with KardiaMobile from AliveCor on Vimeo.

Latest Headlines