Researchers devise method to measure biological aging

Researchers determined 18 factors in an effort to understand when chronic conditions begin to manifest.

By Stephen Feller

DURHAM, N.C., July 8 (UPI) -- While there is a plethora of studies that have been done on older adults who have chronic disease, researchers determined 18 factors to help determine aging in adults in their 20s and 30s in an effort to measure biological age and understand when chronic conditions begin to manifest.

Signs of aging, in organs as well as in skin, joints and hair, can be detected in people as young as 26, including some in the study whose bodies were aging as much as 3 years for every 1 chronological year.


"We set out to measure aging in these relatively young people," said Dan Belsky, an assistant professor of geriatrics in Duke University's Center for Aging, in a press release. "Most studies of aging look at seniors, but if we want to be able to prevent age-related disease, we're going to have to start studying aging in young people."

Researchers used data from the Dunedin Study, which has tracked 1,037 people since they were born in 1972 and 1973. The biomarkers researchers applied to aging assessments include the functions of kidneys, liver, lungs, metabolic and immune systems, as well as HDL cholesterol, cardiorespiratory fitness, and the length of the telomeres in chromosomes.


Using the latest data collected in the study, researchers then set biological ages for each 38-year-old in the study, which ranged from 30 to 60 for the 954 Dunedin participants still active in the study. The researchers then looked back into the archival data at information for the 18 biomarkers collected when the study's subjects were 26 and 32, as well as the data collected at age 38.

Most people in the study were aging one biological year for each chronological year they have been alive, however those who appeared to be biologically older than their age were thought to have been aging at a faster pace. A 38-year-old with a biological age of 40, for example, would have been aging 1.2 years each year of the study.

Researchers found that in addition to evidence of biological aging in some cases out-pacing chronological age, biologically older people reported age-related physical issues and scored worse on tests of balance, coordination, and problem solving. When shown pictures of participants, researchers noted that participants with higher biological ages also appeared to be older than their chronological age.

Belsky suggests intervening in the aging process, rather than treating what conditions that on some level are the symptoms of aging, such as heart disease and cancer.


"As we get older, our risk grows for all kinds of different diseases," Belsky said. "To prevent multiple diseases simultaneously, aging itself has to be the target. Otherwise, it's a game of whack-a-mole."

The study is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Latest Headlines