Dueling claims on Keystone XL's emissions

Sept. 9, 2013 at 7:40 AM
share with facebook
share with twitter
Sign up for our Energy newsletter

WASHINGTON, Sept. 9 (UPI) -- Canada can't move forward with a viable plan to cut back on climate emissions while pressing for the Keystone XL pipeline, an advocacy group said.

Shawn Howard, a spokesman for pipeline planner Keystone XL, said the pipeline would move oil from Alberta to southern U.S. refineries with "almost no direct emissions."

He was responding to reports that Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper sent a letter to President Barack Obama pledging to do more on climate issues in an effort to move the project forward.

Critics of Keystone XL said the heavier type of Canadian crude oil designated for the pipeline is more corrosive and more carbon intensive than other grades of crude oil. Obama, who needs to sign off on the cross-border pipeline, said he'd weigh the project against its environmental footprint.

The Natural Resources Defense Council said Harper's government is falling short of its efforts to curb emissions.

"Any credible plan to address Canada's climate emissions is incompatible with tar sands expansion," NRDC attorney Anthony Swift said in a statement Saturday.

Howard said Canada's track record on the environment was strong.

"Keystone XL will replace one source of heavy oil from places in the Middle East and Venezuela with another source of heavy oil -- resulting in virtually no global impact on emissions," he said.

Related UPI Stories
Trending Stories