About UPI  |  My Account  |  UPI en Español
Free News Update:
Sign up
United Press International - News. Analysis. Insight.™ - 100 Years of Journalistic Excellence
  • Home
  • Top News
  • Entertainment
  • Odd News
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Science
  • Health
  • Analysis
    • Energy Resources
    • Security Industry
    • Emerging Threats
  • Video
  • News Photos
Search:
Go
Bookmark this Page
You are here:  Home / Issue of the Day / Analysis: What Clinton's primary win means

Issue of the Day

View archive | RSS Feed

Analysis: What Clinton's primary win means

By MARTIN SIEFF
Published: May 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Order reprints  |  Print Story  |  Email to a Friend  |  Post a Comment
Analysis: What Clinton's primary win means
Confetti falls on supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) as Clinton delivers remarks after winning the West Virginia primary at a campaign rally in Charleston, West Virginia on May 13, 2008. (UPI Photo/Kevin Dietsch)
Related Stories
  • Obama camp stresses independent appeal
  • Clinton's W.Va. win fueled by white voters
  • Clinton's W.Va. win renews determination
  • Clinton touts her electability
WASHINGTON, May 14 (UPI) -- Sen. Hillary Clinton's landslide victory over Sen. Barack Obama in the West Virginia primary Tuesday brings her no closer to winning the Democratic presidential nomination, but it is still a major blow for Obama.

The Democrats' Iron Woman has rusted badly, but she still packs a punch.

Clinton, D-N.Y., trounced Obama, D-Ill., by a far wider margin in West Virginia than he managed over her in North Carolina and confirmed the Democrats' nightmare that two of their biggest traditional constituencies that they must mobilize to win the presidency in November -- black voters and white working-class voters -- are now at odds.

Obama beat Clinton in North Carolina by 14 points -- a figure that was widely reported as a landslide. But in white working-class, hardscrabble West Virginia, Clinton annihilated him by 67 percent of the vote to 26 percent, a victory margin of 41 points.

It should also be remembered that despite the Obama campaign's tactical skill at sweeping the Democratic caucuses across the United States, Clinton has hammered him in almost every major industrial and large-population state except for his home state of Illinois and neighboring Wisconsin.

Clinton carried New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Arizona and California. With all his momentum, all he could manage was a close second to her even in Indiana. It is extraordinary that a candidate who cannot even command anything close to a majority of his own party's core supporters in so many key states can still be regarded as its almost inevitable presidential nominee.

Clinton's victory showed that Obama remains a huge turnoff for white working-class voters, the children and grandchildren of the Nixon and Reagan Democrats whose defection from the Democrats over the past 40 years, primarily over moral and cultural issues, has ensured decades of conservative political dominance in America.

Obama's 20-year attendance at the church of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright clearly continues to dog him with voters, however much media pundits proclaim that he has put it behind him. And however how humble his own background and that of his wife, Michelle, they have shown themselves incapable of talking the talk and walking the walk with working-class voters struggling to make ends meet. Clinton, despite her own far more privileged background, has been much more successful at that.

However, even Clinton's victory in West Virginia could not restore her as a credible candidate. The day after her victory there, two more crucial superdelegates, Rep. Peter Visclosky of Indiana and Democrats Abroad Chair Christine Schon Marques, defected to Obama.

The liberal and centrist Washington establishments are also rapidly coalescing in their support for the junior senator from Illinois. Three former Securities and Exchange Commission chairmen -- William Donaldson, David Ruder and Arthur Levitt Jr. -- all came out for him on Wednesday, as did the legendary former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who broke the back of inflation under Presidents Carter and Reagan.

Even if Obama should improbably walk away from the race and cede her the nomination, Clinton now carries so much baggage and the burden of such a bungled campaign that she would be easy pickings for Republican front-runner Sen. John McCain of Arizona come November.

Clinton showed appalling incompetence and favoritism in her choice of campaign directors across the country. She let Obama's campaign sweep her in many smaller state primaries, and from Iowa on her team did not have a clue how to operate in caucuses. Her feminism fizzled with voters like a damp squib.

Several of her husband's most famous figures in his administration like former U.N. Ambassador and Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson defected to Obama, and former White House spokesman George Stephanopoulos, now chief political correspondent for ABC News, still predicts his victory.

Both Democratic front-runners, therefore, are hugely flawed candidates.

In a year when the United States continues to suffer casualties in the endless and unpopular continuing war in Iraq and the economic news is more ominous than it has been in at least 35 years, with global oil prices spiking at an extraordinary $126 a barrel, the presidency should be easy pickings for the main opposition party come November. Trust the Democrats to throw even that outcome into doubt.


News Photos Slideshows
Photos of the Day
Week in Photos
News
Entertainment
Sports
Features
Most Popular
Stories
Photos
Videos
1.
Analysis: Paulson and the end of optimism
2.
Analysis: Report fans Iran attack fears
3.
Analysis: Obama can avoid Carter's fate
4.
Analysis: Obama shows genius
5.
Analysis: Half a year of fear and hope
Advertise on UPI.com
Videos
Enlarge Video
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Bush signs war spending bill
Friday, July 4
Young Americans speak out about D.C. voting rights
Young Americans speak out about D.C. voting rights
Thursday, July 3
Home funerals: Tending to their own
Home funerals: Tending to their own
Thursday, July 3
Students say 'I do' to wedding class
Students say 'I do' to wedding class
Tuesday, June 10
© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
United Press International, UPI, the UPI logo, and other trademarks and service marks, are registered or unregistered trademarks of United Press International, Inc. in the United States and in other countries.
Search: Go
Official_Government_Wires  |   About UPI  |   Site Map  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy  |   Advertise Online  |   Contact Us
Sponsored Links: Wedding and Honeymoon Experts - Auto Dealers - Conventions - Trade Shows - Conferences - Motivational Sports Speakers Bureau - Press Release Services - Real Estate Properties in the world