(CT) Avoid Regional Domestic Banks – Zacks Industry Rank Analysis

Decades from now, the summer of 2008 will likely be remembered to mark the turning point where legislative blundering took an otherwise serious financial crisis and molested it into an epic financial collapse.

(Click chart to enlarge)

Mortgage debt of $5.6 trillion is a bubble legacy and the most obvious source of a renewal of the financial crisis.

Dirk van Dijk, CFA is the Chief Equity Strategist for Zacks.com. With more than 25 years investment experience he has become a popular commentator appearing in the Wall Street Journal and on CNBC.  Dirk is also the Editor in charge of the market beating Zacks Strategic Investor http://www.zacks.com/registration/strategicinvestor/welcome/?adid=SI_online_commentary_dvd service.Zacks Investment Research

(FNM) Third Quarter GDP Growth Revised to 2.8%

(BAC) Home Prices Continue to Rise

The following is the first part of a 2-part series of posts on the future of the securitization business. To read Part II, in which a brighter opinion of the securitization market is formed, go here.

Credit default swaps, once all the rage among investors in the days when multi-billion dollar investment banks such as Morgan Stanley (MS) and Goldman Sachs (GS) faced bankruptcy a little over a year ago, have slowed in appeal this year as global markets have made a big push towards risk.

For Immediate Release

Chicago, IL – November 25, 2009 – Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: Bank of America (BAC), MGIC (MTG), Fannie Mae (FNM), Freddie Mac (FRE) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ).

Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513

Here are highlights from Tuesday’s Analyst Blog:

Home Prices Continue to Rise

It is encouraging to see home prices rise. If this continues, some of the people in underwater houses (meaning with a mortgage more than the value of the house) might just see the flood recede and regain some positive equity in the house. This would greatly reduce the number of foreclosures in the future. It would make it an economically rational thing for people to pay their mortgages again. As it stands today in big areas of the country, it isn’t.

As a result, mortgage delinquencies have been skyrocketing, and eventually those delinquencies will lead to foreclosures. That could reignite a vicious circle, where the foreclosed houses flood the market, once again depressing prices, which causes more people to think there are better places to put their money than paying their mortgages.

Rising home prices have the potential to turn that into a virtuous cycle. To the extent that happens, it has very positive implications for the entire mortgage complex, from the big banks like Bank of America (BAC) to the mortgage insurance firms like MGIC (MTG) to the wards of the state, Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE).

However, I fear that the increase in home prices is only temporary. That it is the product of extraordinary government efforts to prop up home prices, and that those efforts can not be sustained forever. These include the tax credit (recently expanded to include move up buyers), which is scheduled to end at the end of April, and the Fed’s program of buying up $1.25 Trillion in mortgage-backed paper to manipulate mortgage rates lower. They should finish up their purchases by the end of March.

HP Revenue Down, EPS In-Line

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) reported fourth quarter EPS of $1.14, exceeding the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny.

Revenue for the quarter came in at $30.8 billion, a decrease of 8.0% from the $33.6 billion reported in the year-ago period and down 5.0% on constant currency basis.

Revenue fell across all businesses, including servers and data storage systems, software, PCs and printers. The Americas reported a 3.0% decline in revenue to $13.6 billion. Revenue declined 17.0% in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) to $11.7 billion and 1.0% in the Asia Pacific to $5.4 billion. Revenue from China increased more than 20% from the year-ago quarter.

International markets accounted for 64% of total revenue in the fourth quarter, with revenue in the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) declining 4.0% on a year-over-year basis and accounting for 10.0% of total HP revenue.

Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515.

About Zacks Equity Research

Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.

Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.

Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517

About Zacks

Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518.

Visit http://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.

Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/zacksresearch

Join us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts

Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.

Contact:
Mark Vickery
Web Content Editor
312-265-9380
Visit: www.zacks.com

Inventory of single-family homes fell 136,000 units in October, but they remain oversupplied by 913,000 units when compared to the long-run average.

This is a revision to the post I put up when the first cut at the GDP report came out on 10/30.  In it the new numbers are in bold and the original estimates are put in parentheses, thus a number in parentheses does not mean that it has a negative value (those will have a minus sign in front of them, numbers relating to the first or second quarters are left unchanged.  New text will be in italics. This should give the reader a clear sense of not only how strong GDP and its components, but also how the latest numbers match up.

The recession is over! In the third quarter GDP grew by 2.8% (3.5%), slightly below (comfortably ahead) of expectations for 2.9% (3.0%) growth. This is a huge improvement over the 0.7% decline in the second quarter and the 6.4% plunge in the first quarter.

The internals of the report were strong as well, although it appears that much of the growth came from things like the Cash for Clunkers program and the extraordinary levels of support that are currently being given to the housing sector.

Growth Rates

The overall 2.8% (3.5%) growth of GDP was almost matched by its biggest component, Personal Consumption expenditures, or PCE, which grew 2.9% (3.4%), a big improvement over the 0.9% decline in the second quarter and the 0.6% increase in the first three months of the year.

It is important to note that during the recession, consumer spending declined far less than did overall GDP, especially in the first quarter, so the consumer was becoming a much bigger part of the overall economy. This is not healthy over the long run, but at this point I think people are happy to get some growth where ever we can find it

Now, you might wonder, what caused the recession to be so nasty last winter when Consumer spending wasn’t really all that bad? The answer is that Investment really fell of a cliff. The good news is that it is starting to come back.

Fixed investment is broken into two parts, Non-Residential or business investment and Residential investment, which is mostly homebuilding.

Overall Fixed investment rose by 0.3% (2.3%) following declines of 12.5% in the 2Q and 39.0% in the 1Q. Business investment, however, continued to decline, but at a much slower rate, falling 4.1% (2.5%) after 9.6% and 39.2% declines in the 2Q and 1Q, respectively. With massive amounts of unused capacity it is not surprising that businesses are cutting back on their capital spending still.

Spending on Equipment and Software (E&S) on the other hand is starting to come back, if only feebly, rising 2.3% (1.1%) after a 4.9% decline in the 2Q and a 36.4% plunge in the 1Q. Look for some stability in this line going forward as the new Microsoft operating system will probably generate a new PC cycle, but with capacity utilization still around 70% I would not expect a boom in orders for new factory equipment.

The real star of fixed investment though came on the residential side, which rose 19.5% (23.4%). This is the first increase in almost four years, and follows declines of 23.3% in the 2Q and 38.2% in the 1Q. The long string of declines had brought residential investment to a record low share of GDP. The extraordinary support of the housing sector by the government, including the first time buyer tax credit, the Fed buying up $1.25 Trillion of Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE) backed paper to artificially suppress mortgage rates and the FHA acting like the old New Century Financial or Washington Mutual on their worst days have played a big role in the turnaround. I seriously question the sustainability of it after the support is removed, and I don’t think the support can continue indefinitely.

Government spending grew by 3.1% (2.3%) in the 3Q, a big slowdown from the 6.7% increase in the 2Q, but more than the 2.6% decline in the 1Q. It was all at the Federal level where spending rose at an annual rate of  8.3% (7.9%) down from a 11.4% increase in the 2Q, but up from the 4.3% decline in the 1Q.

Remember this measure of government spending does not include spending on transfer payments like Social Security and Medicare, which are largely captured in the consumption numbers. Defense spending was the big driver -- we are still a nation fighting two wars. It grew at an annual rate of 8.3% (8.4%) down from a 14.0% rate of increase in the 2Q but up from a 5.1% decline in the 1Q.

International trade has started to rebound, and we saw an increase in both imports and exports. Increasing exports are good for GDP and increases in Imports are bad for GDP, and unfortunately imports rose more than did exports. We were able to improve our overseas sales by 17.0% (14.7%) in the 3Q -- a nice turnaround from the 4.1% decline in the 2Q and the 29.9% plunge in the 1Q. Unfortunately we also increase what we bought from overseas by 20.8% (16.4%), a big turnaround from the 14.7% decline in the 2Q and the 36.4% plunge in the first three months of the year. Keep in mind that we import a lot more than we export, so not only was the percentage increase bigger for imports, it was coming off a higher base.

Contributions to Growth

Not all components of GDP are created equal.  Some are very big, and others relatively small. Some tend to be very stable over time, and some tend to swing violently from quarter to quarter. The bigger and more volatile they are, the more they will impact the overall growth rate of GDP. Thus looking at just the percentage changes in the componenets does not tell the full story. Of the 2.8% (3.5%) total growth, how many points were added or subtracted by each part of the economy?

The biggest part of the economy is the Consumer or PCE, over all it contributed 2.07 (2.36) of the 2.80 (3.50) points of total growth. In the second quarter it caused 0.62 of the 0.70 total decline in the 2Q. In the first quarter it actually offset 0.44 points of the 6.40 total decline. In other words, excluding the consumer the economy would have contracted 6.84% rather than 6.40%.

Within consumer spending, spending on goods added 1.60 (1.79) points after subtracting 0.71 points in the 2Q and adding 0.56 points in the 1Q. Spending on durables was the main driver, adding 1.34 (1.47) points after subtracting 0.41 points in the 2Q and adding 0.28 in the 1Q.  Non durable goods added 0.26 (0.31) points after subtracting 0.29 in the 2Q and adding 0.29 in the 1Q.

Investment spending was a big swing factor in the 3Q.  It added 0.91 (1.22) points to overall growth. That is a HUGE improvement over the 3.10 point subtraction in the 2Q and the 8.98 point implosion in the 1Q.  Unfortunately. 0.87 (0.94) points of that contribution came from inventories. Inventory investment is the “worst" type of GDP growth since large increases in one quarter are usually reversed in the next quarter, or in this case, large declines being reversed upwards. 

In the 2Q inventory investment subtracted 1.42 points from overall growth and in the 1Q they subtracted 2.36 points.  Even in the 4Q they subtracted 0.64 points from growth.  Three straight quarters of sharply lower inventories is highly unusual and we were due for a bounce.  Perhaps we have one more quarter of a solid contribution from inventory investment, but I would not expect it to last much beyond that. 

Overall fixed investment added just 0.04 (0.28) points to growth, but that sure was a nice improvement over the 1.68 point subtraction and the 6.62 point disaster that was the 1Q.

However, it was not coming from the business side.  Business investment subtracted 0.40 (0.24) growth points in the 3Q, so it is still very soft, but at least it is not imploding like it was earlier in the year.  In the 2Q it subtracted 1.01 points and in the 1Q it took away 5.29 growth points.  Within business investment it was spending on structures that caused the problem with a deduction of 0.55 (0.32) growth points while spending on E&S offset 0.15 (0.08) points of that.  In the 2Q both sides of business investment were drags on the economy with investment in Commercial real estate subtracting 0.69 growth points and spending on equipment deducting 0.32 points.  The 2Q was in turn a major improvement over the 1Q disaster where spending on structures subtracted 2.28 growth points and equipment spending subtracted 3.01 points.

Housing finally helped the economy in the 3Q, adding 0.45 (0.53) points to growth, after a string of 15 straight quarters where it was a drag on the economy.  In the 2Q it was a 0.67 point drag and in the 1Q it was a 1.33 point drag.  The long decline has, however, made housing a much smaller share of the overall economy.  In the 3Q residential investment totaled only $360.9 billion, or 2.52% of the overall economy.  At the peak of the housing bubble it represented 6.34% of the overall economy.  Thus the 19.5 (23.3%) increase in residential investment had far less of an overall impact than it did in the past.

Direct government spending had a small but positive impact on overall growth in the 3Q, adding 0.63 (0.48) points a fairly significant slowdown from the 1.33 contribution in the 2Q, but better than the 0.52 point drag in the 1Q.  All the help came from Washington , not city hall or the statehouse.

The Federal government added 0.65 (0.62) growth points, down from 0.85 points in the 2Q but up from a 0.33 point drag in the 1Q.  The Pentagon was the main factor in all three quarters, with defense spending adding 0.48 (0.45) points in the 3Q following a 0.70 addition in the 2Q and a 0.27 point drag in the 1Q.  Non-defense spending was sort of a non issue, adding just 0.17 (0.17) points in the 3Q, not much difference from the 0.15 point contribution in the 2Q, and up a little bit from the slight 0.06 point drag in the 1Q.

State and Local governments are not allowed to run operating deficits, and so when faced with declining tax revenues they have to cut back, unless Uncle Sam helps them out.  Well Washington is helping, but its not enough and S&L spending was a 0.02 (0.14) point drag in the 3Q.  The Federal help was enough in the 2Q and so the contribution to growth in the 2Q was a positive 0.48 points.  In the 1Q, before the stimulus package could get much traction S&L spending was a 0.19 point drag.

Net exports had been just about the only bright spot in the first half of the year, even though it came the wrong way, from both imports and exports plunging, only with imports falling more than exports did.  That reversed in the 3Q as both showed a nice expansion, but our appetite for foreign goods outstripping the desire for U.S. goods and services abroad.  The increase in exports added 1.71 (1.49) points to growth, but the increase in imports was a 2.53 (2.01) point drag, for a net negative contribution from net exports of 0.82 (0.52) points. In the 2Q falling exports subtracted 0.45 points but plunging imports added 2.09 points, for a net imports net help to the economy of 1.64 points.

Overall

Relative to the first cut at the data, the downward revisions were broad based, with smaller contributions from all major areas of the economy, with the exception of the government.  Of particular concern is that fixed investments contribution to growth virtually disappeared.

 
Dirk van Dijk, CFA is the Chief Equity Strategist for Zacks.com. With more than 25 years investment experience he has become a popular commentator appearing in the Wall Street Journal and on CNBC. Dirk is also the Editor in charge of the market-beating Zacks Strategic Investor service.