facebook
twitter
rss
account
search
search
 

Appeals court upholds ruling in stop-and-frisk case

Nov. 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM   |   Comments

NEW YORK, Nov. 22 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a lower court's ruling that the New York City's stop-and-frisk policy is carried out in a discriminatory manner.

In August, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that the city's police officers sometimes carried out stop-and-frisk unconstitutionally and discriminated against people of color, WNBC-TV, New York, reported.

Then, last month, Scheindlin was removed from the case and an appeals panel suspended the effects of a her ruling.

The city argued that suspending Scheindlin from the panel should also nullify her decision, however, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday upheld her ruling.

© 2013 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.
Most Popular
1
Shark attacks surfer at Santa Cruz beach Shark attacks surfer at Santa Cruz beach
2
Merkel urges Putin to withdraw Russian troops from Ukraine Merkel urges Putin to withdraw Russian troops from Ukraine
3
Ohio school bus driver killed saving girl Ohio school bus driver killed saving girl
4
The FBI announces completion of facial recognition program The FBI announces completion of facial recognition program
5
Rush Limbaugh: Women actually are consenting when they say 'no' Rush Limbaugh: Women actually are consenting when they say 'no'
Trending News
Video
x
Feedback