facebook
twitter
rss
account
search
search
 

Appeals court upholds ruling in stop-and-frisk case

Nov. 22, 2013 at 1:55 PM   |   Comments

NEW YORK, Nov. 22 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a lower court's ruling that the New York City's stop-and-frisk policy is carried out in a discriminatory manner.

In August, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that the city's police officers sometimes carried out stop-and-frisk unconstitutionally and discriminated against people of color, WNBC-TV, New York, reported.

Then, last month, Scheindlin was removed from the case and an appeals panel suspended the effects of a her ruling.

The city argued that suspending Scheindlin from the panel should also nullify her decision, however, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday upheld her ruling.

© 2013 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.
Featured UPI Collection
trending
2014: The Year in Music [PHOTOS]

2014: The Year in Music [PHOTOS]

Most Popular
1
New York Post defies #ISISMediablackout with graphic James Foley cover
2
Russia, Ukraine give ICRC necessary security guarantees for aid convoy
3
NATO soldier stabbed, killed near Kabul airport
4
David Cameron: 'Increasingly likely' jihadist in Foley video is British citizen
5
Group tweaks Westboro Baptist Church with 'God Loves Gays' campaign
Trending News
Video
x
Feedback