facebook
twitter
search
search

Monitor proposal holding up agreement with Arizona sheriff, ACLU

Aug. 17, 2013 at 2:10 PM

PHOENIX, Aug. 17 (UPI) -- Lawyers say a dispute over the extent of a court-appointed monitor's power is delaying resolution of a suit against Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

A federal judge ordered monitoring of the controversial sheriff's office in December, in a finding that Arpaio was guilty of racial profiling in the detention of ethnic minorities.

The manner in which the monitor will function is one of 11 areas that remain unresolved in negotiations with the American Civil Liberties Union, The Arizona Republic reported Friday.

Tim Casey, the sheriff's attorney, said Arpaio remains opposed to a court-appointed monitor.

While the sheriff was "very receptive and cooperative," Casey said the ACLU's proposal for the monitor to review a deputy's performance was beyond the scope of the judge's order.

"This lawsuit was not about any malfeasance in internal-affairs matters," he said.

Because the sheriff is an elected official, the monitor's power "has to be consistent" with powers granted to the sheriff by the state constitution, the attorney said.

"Unlike a police chief, the monitor cannot have the ultimate veto," Casey added.

The sheriff has rejected an ACLU proposal for an advisory board. Casey said Arpaio fears the board will be used to remove his from office.

Related UPI Stories
Latest Headlines
Top Stories
Hyon Yong Chol disparaged Kim Jong Un prior to execution, analyst says
Officials debate 'when to suspend' search for missing Florida boys
Jon Stewart, Obama held secret meetings at White House
In Khamenei Tweet, man resembling Obama holds gun to head
Napa Valley fire reignites, hundreds more evacuated