UPI en Español  |   UPI Asia  |   About UPI  |   My Account
Search:
Go

Prop 8 filed with U.S. Supreme Court

|
 
Demonstrators in favor of gay marriage await the California Supreme Court decision on state Proposition 8, a ballot initiative limiting marriage to a man and a woman, in front of City Hall in San Francisco on May 26, 2009. (UPI Photo/Terry Schmitt)
Demonstrators in favor of gay marriage await the California Supreme Court decision on state Proposition 8, a ballot initiative limiting marriage to a man and a woman, in front of City Hall in San Francisco on May 26, 2009. (UPI Photo/Terry Schmitt) 
License photo
Published: July 31, 2012 at 2:48 PM

SACRAMENTO, July 31 (UPI) -- Supporters of California's Proposition 8, which bans gay marriage, said Tuesday they've taken their case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

ProtectMarriage.com said it filed a petition to the high court asking it to reverse an appeals court panel that struck down Prop 8.

California voters approved Prop 8, the California Marriage Protection Act, in 2008. It overturned a ruling by the California Supreme Court, which itself had overturned an earlier but similar proposition as unconstitutional.

But a federal judge declared Prop 8 unconstitutional, and three-judge appeals court panel in San Francisco agreed 2-1.

However, the panel stayed its ruling until Prop 8 supporters could ask the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for a new hearing. The full circuit rejected the case, but on June 5 it gave Prop 8 supporters a 90-day stay to file a petition for review at the Supreme Court.

In a statement Tuesday, ProtectMarriage.com said its petition says "our Constitution does not mandate the traditional definition of marriage, but neither does our Constitution condemn it. Rather, it leaves the definition of marriage in the hands of the people, to be resolved through the democratic process in each state."

"The Supreme Court has made it very clear that the age-old definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman is constitutional as a matter of state public policy," lead counsel Charles J. Cooper with the Cooper & Kirk law firm, said in the statement. "The lower court decisions essentially rejected all relevant Supreme Court and appellate court precedent while attacking the character and judgment of millions of Californians. We are hopeful and confident that the Supreme Court will grant review and ultimately uphold its precedent and the will of the people."

Recommended Stories
© 2012 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
'Star Trek Into Darkness' screening NBC upfronts Met Ball 2013
'Great Gatsby' premieres in New York Spire raised on top of One WTC 2013: Celebrity break ups and divorces
Additional U.S. News Stories
1 of 18
Palestinian  Security Forces Patrol the Border With Egypt.
View Caption
A members of the Hamas security forces patrol the border area between Gaza and Egypt, in the southern Gaza Strip May 20, 2013. Egyptian police angered by the kidnapping of seven colleagues by Islamist gunmen kept a crossing into the Gaza Strip closed again for four days, stranding hundreds of Palestinian travellers, As Tunnels between Egypt and Gaza closed and border was declared as military zone. Palestinian security forces patrol around the border, witnesses said. UPI/Ismael Mohamad
fark
18' 8" Burmese python, about 10 pair of boots, caught on side of the road
Amazing: Matching all six Powerball numbers. Fark: On a ticket you bought too late
Photoshop Dr. Tobias Fünke, who is ready to be inserted anywhere
Oklahoma tornado thread continued. LGT live updates/streaming
Attention all highly experienced, seasoned employees of RollingStone.com: your new boss is the 22-year-old...
ACTUAL HEADLINE: Big rig carrying fruit crashes on 210 Freeway, creates jam