UPI en Español  |   UPI Asia  |   About UPI  |   My Account
Search:
Go

Healthcare ruling may come Thursday

|
 
The United States Supreme Court (file photo) UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg
The United States Supreme Court (file photo) UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg 
License photo
Published: June 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM

WASHINGTON, June 25 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court didn't rule Monday on President Obama's signature healthcare law, one of its biggest rulings "in the last 50, 60 years."

But the court said the justices would sit again Thursday, presumably to issue the healthcare decision and other remaining rulings, before recessing for the summer. Given that opinions are handed down in the order of justices' seniority, Chief Justice John Roberts may be writing the majority opinion.

Besides shaking up the 2012 presidential race, the case will define the legacies of Obama and of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts -- and shape the future of the U.S. healthcare system, The Hill reported.

"We're keeping a close eye on it. Absolutely. We're having a war room ... every Monday and Thursday," Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., said.

"Nothing I can do about it; it'll come when it comes," Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., said. "It's kind of like waiting to go into a firefight. You don't want to be too anxious to do it."

The case is a landmark decision on the breadth of Congress' constitutional power and will rival some of the Supreme Court's most important decisions ever, one lawmaker told The Hill.

"It's huge," said Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., a doctor and healthcare law critic. "I think it's one of the biggest decisions the court has made in the last 50, 60 years -- Brown vs. Board of Education [on school desegregation], Roe vs. Wade [on abortion], the 2000 presidential election [between George W. Bush and Al Gore] -- those are all big decisions, and this is one of them."

Twenty-six states and the National Federation of Independent Business challenged the healthcare law, contending its individual mandate requiring most taxpayers to buy insurance or pay a penalty is unconstitutional. If the court agrees with the argument, it also must decide whether to void the entire law or only part of it.

Topics: Diana DeGette, George W. Bush, Al Gore
© 2012 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
'Star Trek Into Darkness' screening NBC upfronts Met Ball 2013
'Great Gatsby' premieres in New York Spire raised on top of One WTC 2013: Celebrity break ups and divorces
Additional U.S. News Stories
1 of 16
Tornadoes Devastate Moore, Oklahoma
View Caption
A damaged movie theater is seen in aftermath of a series of tornadoes in Moore, Oklahoma, May 21, 2013. On May 20 a series of tornadoes swept through severals towns south of Oklahoma City leaving a path of destruction and killing at least 24 people. UPI/J.P. Wilson
fark
Doctors who performed life-saving face transplant on accident victim say there's hope he'll recover...
If you knocked a cyclist off his bike and then boasted about it on Twitter @NorwichPoliceUK would...
The real reason the NYPD likes stop-and-frisk is not to keep weapons off the street: It's free weed...
13 NJ TGI Fridays accused of selling well drinks labeled as premium brands, also not wearing enough...
Mom dies, gives birth, then gets brought back to life
An underground nightclub in a rooftop water tower