facebook
twitter
rss
account
search
search
 

U.N. rights experts probe bin Laden killing

May 6, 2011 at 3:18 PM   |   Comments

2 of 5
| License Photo
UNITED NATIONS, May 6 (UPI) -- U.N. human-rights experts Friday called for details on the killing of terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden and whether there were plans to capture him alive.

"In respect of the recent use of deadly force against Osama bin Laden, the United States of America should disclose the supporting facts to allow an assessment in terms of international human rights law standards," Christof Heyns, the expert dealing with extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, and Martin Scheinin, who deals with human rights and counter-terrorism, said in a joint statement.

"For instance it will be particularly important to know if the planning of the mission allowed an effort to capture bin Laden," they said.

The al-Qaida founder was killed at his hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in the predawn hours Monday by U.S. Navy SEALs.

Heyns and Scheinin -- unpaid, independent experts for the U.N. Human Rights Council -- asserted the "norm should be that terrorists be dealt with as criminals, through legal processes of arrest, trial and judicially decided punishment."

Obama administration officials insist the clandestine operation, enacted without the knowledge of Pakistani authorities, complied with all domestic and international law.

"Let me make something very clear: The operation in which Osama bin Laden was killed was lawful," Attorney General Eric Holder told Congress Wednesday. "He was the head of al-Qaida, an organization that conducted the attacks of Sept. 11 (2001). He admitted his involvement."

American University Washington College of Law Professor Kenneth Anderson told ABC News the U.S. government's shifting narrative of the raid -- including whether bin Laden was armed and how much resistance the SEALs encountered in the alleged "firefight" -- has engendered some measure of legitimate international criticism.

"Holder was not direct in stating that of course it was legal to target Osama bin Laden, legal to target with lethal force, legal to target without warning or invitation to surrender," Anderson said. "And that has always been the U.S. legal position.

"The United States actually has firm legal views on these points, which unfortunately, probably for reasons of operational secrecy, the senior leadership hasn't properly communicated," he said.

But many observers say capturing bin Laden would have been a next-to-impossible task.

"From a Navy SEAL perspective, you had to believe that this guy was a walking [improvised explosive device]," Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., said at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday.

© 2011 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.
Recommended UPI Stories
Featured UPI Collection
trending
Celebrity Couples of 2014 [PHOTOS]

Celebrity Couples of 2014 [PHOTOS]

Most Popular
1
The UN has released its list of leaders attending climate summit The UN has released its list of leaders attending climate summit
2
Hurricane Odile now a dangerous category 4 storm Hurricane Odile now a dangerous category 4 storm
3
Navy halts search for missing jet pilot after crash Navy halts search for missing jet pilot after crash
4
Mary Landrieu spent $33K of taxpayers' money on campaign travel Mary Landrieu spent $33K of taxpayers' money on campaign travel
5
Bernie Sanders says he may run for president in 2016 Bernie Sanders says he may run for president in 2016
Trending News
Video
x
Feedback