Court: Judge rules when agreement is made

June 24, 2010 at 5:46 PM

WASHINGTON, June 24 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday ruled that a trial court, rather than an arbitrator, should determine when a collective bargaining agreement is formed.

A decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas said that arbitration is appropriate when a dispute arises after the formation of, or under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement. It would not be correct for an arbitrator to determine questions pertaining to when such an agreement was formed.

The high court affirmed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' judgment dismissing Granite Rock's claims against the union to the extent those claims depend on the creation of a new federal common-law tort cause of action, and remanded the case to the district court for further litigation. The court agreed with the employer, Granite Rock Co., that the union interfered with the bargaining agreement.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed a partial dissenting opinion in which Justice John Paul Stevens joined.

Like Us on Facebook for more stories from UPI.com  
Latest Headlines
Top Stories
10-month-old Turkish baby rescued after floating out to sea
Immigrant who shot S.F. woman was deported 5 times in the past, police say
5-year-old Florida girl killed by leaping sturgeon
Fidel Castro makes first public appearance in months
Stonie upsets Chestnut at Nathan's annual Hot Dog Eating Contest