UPI en Español  |   UPI Asia  |   About UPI  |   My Account
Search:
Go

Court: Suspect must claim Miranda rights

|
 
Justice Anthony Kennedy, shown on Sept. 29, 2009. UPI/Gary Fabiano/POOL
Justice Anthony Kennedy, shown on Sept. 29, 2009. UPI/Gary Fabiano/POOL 
License photo
Published: June 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM

WASHINGTON, June 1 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Tuesday along its ideological divide a suspect must unequivocally claim his right to remain silent in order to have that right.

A dissent said the decision "turns Miranda (vs. Arizona) upside down." Miranda requires police to advise suspects of their right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. Once those rights are invoked, police must end their questioning until a lawyer is present.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, the high court's key swing vote, joined four conservatives to form the narrow majority.

The case involves Van Chester Thompkins, convicted of shooting Samuel Morris to death outside a mall in Southfield, Mich., in 2000. Another shooting victim survived and later testified.

Thompkins fled, but was arrested a year later in Ohio. Two Southfield officers traveled to Ohio to question him. They advised Thompkins of his Miranda rights, and the suspect remained largely silent for 3 hours. At no point did he invoke his Miranda rights, court records say.

But near the end of the interrogation, the suspect answered "yes" when asked whether he prayed to God to forgive him for the shooting.

Though his lawyers tried to suppress the statement, Thompkins was convicted and sentenced to life. However, a federal appeals court reversed on constitutional review.

The Supreme Court reversed the appeals court.

Kennedy said Thompkins' silence during his interrogation did not invoke his right to remain silent. If a suspect makes an ambiguous or equivocal invocation of that right, police are not required to end their questioning, he said.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by three other liberals, dissented.

"Today's decision turns Miranda upside down," she said. "Criminal suspects must now unambiguously invoke their right to remain silent -- which, counter-intuitively, requires them to speak. At the same time, suspects will be legally presumed to have waived their rights even if they have given no clear expression of their intent to do so."

© 2010 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
'Star Trek Into Darkness' screening NBC upfronts Met Ball 2013
'Great Gatsby' premieres in New York Spire raised on top of One WTC 2013: Celebrity break ups and divorces
Additional U.S. News Stories
1 of 16
Tornadoes Devastate Moore, Oklahoma
View Caption
A damaged movie theater is seen in aftermath of a series of tornadoes in Moore, Oklahoma, May 21, 2013. On May 20 a series of tornadoes swept through severals towns south of Oklahoma City leaving a path of destruction and killing at least 24 people. UPI/J.P. Wilson
fark
"If you're going to act like Nellie Olsen, you're going to dress like Nellie Olsen." Mom punishes...
Real estate tip: Just because your house overlooks a golf course doesn't mean it will always be...
Man breaks into fortune teller's home to get his money back after love spell fails. Guess she didn't...
Marijuana bacon. Dude
You run out of gas along the interstate. Do you A: Call a friend for help? B: Call a tow truck?...
Thanks to generous donations a 91 year old WWII vet will not be evicted from his home of 56 years...