UPI en Español  |   UPI Asia  |   About UPI  |   My Account
Search:
Go

Neo-Nazi's Ohio death sentence restored

|
 
Stephen Breyer is seen after the Supreme Court Justices of the United States posed for their official "family" group photo and then allowed members of the media to take photos afterward on September 29, 2009, at the Supreme Court in Washington. UPI/Gary Fabiano/POOL
Stephen Breyer is seen after the Supreme Court Justices of the United States posed for their official "family" group photo and then allowed members of the media to take photos afterward on September 29, 2009, at the Supreme Court in Washington. UPI/Gary Fabiano/POOL 
License photo
Published: Jan. 12, 2010 at 1:54 PM

WASHINGTON, Jan. 12 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday reinstated the death sentence of a neo-Nazi who went on a 1982 killing spree at Cleveland State University.

A unanimous opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer said a federal appeals court made a mistake in setting aside Frank Spisak Jr.'s death penalty.

Spisak killed three people, and shot a fourth seven times. The fourth victim survived.

Spisak testified at his trial that he was following the teachings of Adolf Hitler and promised to continue killing, Clear Channel radio reported. A jury convicted him and sentenced him to death. The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the conviction and the death sentence in 1988, the report said.

But Breyer said a federal appeals court based in Cincinnati agreed with Spisak's lawyers, who said the jury's instructions before the sentencing were unconstitutional -- that that jury was told it could only consider mitigating circumstances, details which might incline them to mercy, if they unanimously found them to be mitigating. The appeals court also agreed with Spisak that an inadequate closing argument by his trial lawyer deprived him of effective assistance of counsel.

In reversing the appeals court, Breyer said the instructions were not inconsistent with federal law, and even assuming that his lawyer's closing argument was inadequate, there's no indication that a more effective argument would have made a difference given "Spisak's boastful and unrepentant confessions, and his threats to commit further violent acts."

Topics: Closing Argument, Justice Stephen Breyer
© 2010 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.

Order reprints
Join the conversation
Most Popular Collections
'Star Trek Into Darkness' screening NBC upfronts Met Ball 2013
'Great Gatsby' premieres in New York Spire raised on top of One WTC 2013: Celebrity break ups and divorces
Additional U.S. News Stories
1 of 18
Palestinian  Security Forces Patrol the Border With Egypt.
View Caption
A members of the Hamas security forces patrol the border area between Gaza and Egypt, in the southern Gaza Strip May 20, 2013. Egyptian police angered by the kidnapping of seven colleagues by Islamist gunmen kept a crossing into the Gaza Strip closed again for four days, stranding hundreds of Palestinian travellers, As Tunnels between Egypt and Gaza closed and border was declared as military zone. Palestinian security forces patrol around the border, witnesses said. UPI/Ismael Mohamad
fark
Eyewear company seeks assistance to give two patent trolls important life advice, specifically on...
News: Unexpected gatecrashers ransack house. Fark: Baboons. Baboons everywhere
You can do a lot of bad things as a priest and hang on to your job. Plagiarizing sermons from sermons.com...
Sponsored Content is Pretty Farking Awesome (Featured Partner)
Guatemalan ex-president convicted of genocide last week gets a mulligan
Is Pope Francis a wizard?