COLLEGE PARK, Md., May 31 (UPI) -- As U.S. President Barack Obama travels the country speaking about immigration, student loans, taxes and the like, increasingly Democratic leaders are lobbying him to tell voters how his agenda strengthens the middle class.
Otherwise Republicans, they fear, will use the Internal Revenue Service and other scandals to distract public attention and stall most of his legislative proposals.
Unfortunately, most of Obama's initiatives may appease liberal elites but don't do much to bolster opportunities for middle-class and working families.
His immigration policy comes down to spending record sums to deport undocumented immigrants with criminal records but letting just about anyone else who manages to get across the border stay and have babies -- presumably, who will one day vote Democratic.
If he gets his way in proposed legislation, many undocumented workers will eventually become citizens and businesses like GE and Apple will be permitted more visas in areas like engineering, but the border won't be secured.
The ranks of semiskilled immigrant workers, who drive down wages in hospitality, construction, manufacturing and other sectors, will continue to swell, frustrating the middle-class aspirations of the working poor born in this country.
Obama's massive expansion of student loans permits universities to jack up tuition, bloat administrative staffs and indulge faculty to teach even less and less effectively. Students are graduating encumbered by massive debt and too few marketable skills.
Broke and unemployed, they aren't marrying and starting families -- that shrinks the middle class.
Despite the availability of loans, skyrocketing tuition mandates ever greater family contributions to finance college. This puts higher education further out of reach for many working-class families, and fewer low-income children are pursuing post-secondary education than in the past. That shrinks the middle class, too.
Organized labor, academics and other progressives jealous of peers in business endlessly obsess about income redistribution and tax rates. The president has jacked up taxes on families earning more than $250,000.
Unfortunately, most businesses in America are either proprietorships or pass-through corporations that pay the higher individual -- as opposed to corporate -- tax rates, raising the cost of investing and expanding businesses. That spells fewer jobs for the middle class and those that aspire to its ranks.
Unable to push through Congress limits on carbon dioxide emissions, Obama has used executive orders and the Environmental Protection Agency to impose limits by fiat.
Unfortunately, those raise manufacturing costs, China has no such limits, and all this encourages business to outsource in China. Again fewer jobs for the middle class and aspiring middle class.
Free trade agreements that permit trading partners to undervalue their currencies, subsidize exports and artificially under price their products on U.S. store shelves, healthcare mandates that raise the price of insuring employees instead of controlling costs, unnecessarily cumbersome regulations to run factories, mindless limits on developing U.S. oil reserves and exporting abundant natural gas to countries that shut out U.S. products with high tariffs all encourage outsourcing, not just in manufacturing but for many supporting services, too. Yet again, fewer jobs for middle-class Americans.
Performance, not polemics, is the problem. Obama's progressive agenda has accomplished 2.1 percent growth and an anemic job market since the economic recovery began.
In comparable circumstances, Ronald Reagan engineered 5 percent growth and many more middle-class jobs by rejecting the failed policies of the left and betting on American's competitive instincts.
Democrats are asking too much of Obama to explain how his agenda helps the middle class. There's no there, there.
(Peter Morici is an economist and professor at the Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, and widely published columnist. Follow him on Twitter: @pmorici1)
(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)