In 2013, growth slipped to 1.9 percent thanks to the $200 billion January tax increase and sequestration spending cuts, and this is simply not enough to bring unemployment down to an acceptable level, support strong wage gains and reduce income inequality.
Friday's report indicates that neither the economy nor the job market have shifted into high gear, as the White House preaches and private economists who flack for the Obama administration have claimed.
Unemployment dropped to 6.7 percent because 525,000 additional unemployed adults were discouraged and didn't seek a job. Also, many prime-working-age adults remain stuck in low-wage, part-time jobs with few or no benefits.
Factoring in those frustrated adults, the jobless rate rises to 13.1 percent.
The economy needs to add about 365,000 jobs each month to push unemployment down to about 6 percent and provide those folks with decent paying, full-time employment. That would require gross domestic product growth in the range of 4-5 percent.
Over the last four years, the pace has been a paltry 2.3 percent but much stronger growth is possible. During the Reagan recession of the early 1980s, unemployment peaked at a much higher level than during the recession President Barack Obama inherited, and GDP advanced at a 4.9 percent over the comparable period of recovery.
Slow growth and weak demand for labor are among the primary causes of wage stagnation, inequality and worsening conditions for families at the lower end of the income ladder.
Retailers catering to those families, such as Family Dollar Stores, Sears and K-Mart, had weak holiday sales. In the year ahead, price cuts and even thinner margins will be necessary to sustain their sales as the outlook for their customers remains poor.
The defining difference between the recent recovery and the strong record of the 1980s has been the Obama administration's reliance on policies that simply address the symptoms of economic stagnation, such as the expansion of Medicare, longer unemployment benefits and support for a higher minimum wage.
Washington has failed to confront structural issues that cause subpar growth, chronic unemployment, income inequality and poverty. Important among those are inefficient and dysfunctional government regulation of business, prohibitions on domestic petroleum development off the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf of Mexico coasts and protectionist policies in China and elsewhere in Asia that limit market opportunities for competitive U.S. products.
U.S. automakers are essentially blocked from selling American-made vehicles in China's huge market, even though Chinese manufacturers are terribly uncompetitive. U.S. carmakers are compelled to form joint ventures and share knowhow with Chinese partners to produce and sell in the world's second largest economy.
These and similar restrictions steal millions of American jobs in autos and supporting industries like electronics, metals and plastics and computer software.
Eliminating the resulting $450 billion trade deficit on oil and manufactured products would create more than 4 million jobs directly and at least another 2.5 million as those additional workers' spending spread through the economy.
This would raise living standards and reduce income inequality much more pervasively than expanding Medicare, raising the minimum wage and other politically popular but largely ineffective policies.
(Peter Morici is an economist and professor at the Smith School of Business,, University of Maryland, and widely published columnist. Follow him on Twitter: @pmorici1)
(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)