Longer term, the nation faces fundamental structural problems that neither political party seems willing to address in a comprehensive and systemic fashion.
Unemployment stands at 9 percent and would be much higher but for the fact that many adults have quit looking for work -- discouraged by poor pay and unsatisfying work in an economy that creates too few professional positions for the bludgeoning supply of college graduates.
Middle-aged workers with savings and lesser-earning spouses in two-income families simply have quit the labor force rather than put a B.A. in English, M.S. in Social Work or an M.B.A. in finance -- and in many cases decades of professional work experience -- behind the counter at Barnes and Noble, Staples or Starbucks.
To bring unemployment down to 6 percent over three years, the economy must add 380,000 jobs a month and grow at least 4 percent a year. Dependence on foreign oil and the inability of U.S. industry to pay for surging imports with more exports and compete with foreign products in U.S. markets is holding down the recovery.
Housing won't rescue the economy. The only white stallions available are more realistic energy and trade policies. Something U.S President Barack Obama and Republican leadership in Congress have been want to offer.
Growth and jobs
The economy must grow at about 3 percent just to keep unemployment constant at 9 percent because business productivity improves 2 percent a year and the labor force -- through population growth and immigration -- increases at about 1 percent.
However, since the recovery began in July 2009, the economy has grown at a paltry 2.8 percent and America's workers are in neutral.
But that's an average. Those with the best jobs in places like Wall Street keep doing better and the rest slowly sink with stagnant incomes, rising gas prices and ever more burdensome state and local taxes.
The economy only grew 1.8 percent in the first quarter. Poor weather slowed commercial construction, rising gas tapping consumer spending from other sectors and defense and state and local government spending slowed.
Initially, most forecasters and the Federal Reserve expected better weather, higher defense spending and a firming housing market would lift growth to 3 to 3.5 percent in the second quarter.
However, the housing market continues to falter under the weight of millions of unsold homes and the uncertain consequences for home values from millions of anticipated foreclosures. The latter is exacerbated by the suits brought by states' attorneys general and the U.S. Justice Department that emphasize exacting big financial penalties more than resolving the foreclosure crisis. With some justification, consumers are growing pessimistic -- though consumer spending is increasing, it isn't increasing rapidly enough to create a self-sustaining recovery.
Economists were foolish to place so many hopes on a housing market recovery and consumers. Millions of unsold homes will impel slow housing construction for many years and consumers can't be expected to spend a lot more if too many of their dollars go abroad to pay for expensive oil and Chinese goods and don't return home to create jobs.
Now a second recession is a clear and present danger. Growth in the range of 2 to 2.5 percent isn't sustainable because many businesses can meet such modest growth in demand by improving productivity and laying off workers to maintain margins in the face of rising energy and other commodity prices. Layoffs slice household income and a negative cycle of reduced spending begins.
Indeed, the four-week moving average for new unemployment claims is 438,500, up from 390,000 the week of April 2 -- a rate below 350,000 is consistent with a strong economy and above 400,000 is perilously close to recession levels.
Without stronger growth in the second and third quarters, the economy will cycle down into recession. It can't likely continue to drag along at about 2 percent indefinitely.
Importance of core private sector jobs
Until February, the private sector was creating few permanent jobs. Most jobs were either in healthcare and social services, which enjoy heavy government subsidies, or temporary business services. Excluding those activities, the "core" private sector gained 222,000 158,000 and 229,000 jobs in February, March and April; whereas during the prior 13 months, the average gain was only 47,000.
Core private sector jobs have the potential to set off a virtuous cycle of hiring, consumer spending and more hiring but after such a deep recession, 203,000 jobs per month is simply not enough.
The economy must add 13.7 million private sector jobs over the next three years -- 380,000 each month -- to bring unemployment down to 6 percent. Considering layoffs at state and local governments and likely federal spending cuts, core private sector jobs must increase at least 350,000 to 400,000 a month to accomplish that goal.
Growth in the range of 4 to 5 percent is needed to get unemployment down to 6 percent over the next several years.
Prior to the turmoil in the Middle East, economists were forecasting 3.5 percent growth for 2011 but the surge in gasoline prices to nearly $4 per gallon and a more realistic assessment of the housing market shave at least 1 percentage point from that outlook.
For the entire year, growth in the range of 2.5 percent would be right on the razor's edge of what is sustainable without the economy tumbling into recession from additional layoffs.
Structural impediments to growth
The U.S. economy and the durability of American prosperity are too vulnerable because temporary tax cuts, stimulus spending and large federal deficits don't address structural problems holding back gross domestic product growth and jobs creation -- the huge trade deficit, dysfunctional energy and tax policies and rising healthcare costs are the culprits.
At 3.3 percent of GDP, the $500 billion trade deficit is a tax on domestic demand that erases the benefits of tax cuts. Consequently, the U.S. economy is expanding at about 3 percent a year instead of the 5 percent pace that is possible after emerging from a deep recession and with such high unemployment.
Oil and trade with China account for nearly the entire U.S. trade deficit.
The Obama administration is banking on electric cars and alternative technologies, such as wind and solar, to replace imported oil but those won't pull down gasoline consumption enough to reduce enough the oil import bill for the balance of this decade.
Americans will continue to burn millions of barrels of gasoline each day and require oil. Developing domestic reserves and more aggressively building out fuel efficient vehicles would fire up growth and create high paying jobs. However, Obama administration energy policies block domestic drilling and inadequately encourage more natural gas use. Government-rescued General Motors fights fuel efficiency tooth and nail. The Volt is a novelty on its balance sheet -- it lags Ford and Toyota in hybrid technology and gas-guzzling Escalades still anchor its business model.
Failure to actively encourage more domestic oil and gas production and push GM to get with the program on energy conservation, by sending dollars abroad for oil imports, are lethal jobs killer.
China maintains an undervalued currency by purchasing about $450 billion in foreign currencies each year -- this reduces domestic Chinese consumption and subsidizes Chinese exports by about 35 percent. Failure to act to offset Chinese currency subsidies, for example by taxing dollar-yuan conversions, is the single most significant failure in the Obama administration policy to create an adequate number of jobs.
More broadly, major trading partners in Europe and Asia rely on value added taxes to finance government and health care, whereas Americans pay higher corporate taxes and directly for healthcare.
Under WTO rules, VATs are rebateable on exports from Europe and Asia and are applied on imports from the United States into those markets, creating huge pricing disadvantages -- American products are essentially taxed twice.
A neutral change in U.S. tax policy toward a VAT -- swapping a VAT for reductions in corporate and personal income taxes -- would help remove a major competitive disadvantage on U.S. exporting and import-competing industries.
Finally, the 2010 healthcare law is pushing up healthcare costs rather than reducing those as promised, making insurance unaffordable for many small and medium-sized businesses. Although manufacturing has enjoyed a stronger recovery than the rest of the economy, it has been significantly focused on activities that use very little labor illustrating the burden that healthcare imposes on U.S. employers.
The recent Standard and Poor's warning that U.S. debt may lose its AAA rating was more than a statement about the political gridlock in budget negotiations. U.S. debt problems will ultimately require more robust growth in employment and tax revenues and require Congress and the president to revamp energy, trade, tax and healthcare policy. Without those, the American economy cannot succeed.
(Peter Morici is a professor at the Smith School of Business, University of Maryland School, and former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.)
(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)
Defense at risk, but not why you think