Fans fume over Chargers' home smoking ban

Published: Aug. 25, 2009 at 11:27 PM

SAN DIEGO, Aug. 25 (UPI) -- San Diego Chargers fans who smoke say they are fuming over a new smoking ban sprung on them without notice.

Fans can no longer light up in formerly designated smoking areas inside Qualcomm Stadium, the Chargers' home, which is owned by the city, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported Tuesday.

The only public notice of the new rule came at the end of a long news release posted on the team's Web site before its first pre-season game, the newspaper said.

Chargers officials will provide more information about the ban at a news conference before the Chargers' next home pre-season game Sept. 4, said Mike McSweeney, the stadium operations manager.

McSweeney said the team, the city's police department, stadium management and the mayor's office had jointly decided to impose the ban.

Each smoking ban violation may result in a fine of up to $136 and ejection from the stadium.

Tailgaters can still smoke in the parking lot outside the stadium.

© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Second false alarm delays spacewalk (30 min)
Sisters seeking damages for dropped coffin (32 min)
Meat on the menu for Connecticut thieves (43 min)
Mothers among loyal 'Twilight' fans (51 min)
UPI NewsTrack Entertainment News
U.N. official urges disaster preparedness
Hacked e-mails highlight climate dispute
fark
When schools remove chocolate milk from the cafeteria they are simultanously bombarded with student...
Funny, subby's cold-as-a-fish ex-wife is also named Wendy. I hope this doesn't get greenlit
Not news: dark-skinned man illegally parks car in London. Still not news: it's a riced-out Honda....
Not-Christmas not-tree decorated with not-lights will sit on city common this generic holiday season...
Rice paddy art. Sure it's a slide show, but if they can plan and plant this and erect a tower to...
University bars 30+ students from graduating due to their obesity. This headline would have been...