Palin-supported abortion bill stalls

Published: July 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Republican VP candidate Palin campaigns in Nevada

ANCHORAGE, Alaska, July 3 (UPI) -- One of Alaska's top public health officials says she was forced out because Gov. Sarah Palin felt she was out of step on social issues.

The main issue in doubt reportedly dealt with abortion.

Beverly Wooley, who has worked more than 20 years in public health in Alaska, ended her stint as state public health director Wednesday.

She was the second top health official to leave within days. The state's chief medical officer, Jay Butler, left in late June after declining to take on Wooley's job along with his own.

The key source of tension was legislation that would have required girls less than 17 to get parental consent for an abortion, Wooley told the Anchorage Daily News. The bill, which Palin actively supported, passed the state House but stalled in the Senate. Wooley and Butler also were actively involved in the issue.

A compromise under consideration would require girls to notify their parents before an abortion but not need permission to have one.

Palin declined to comment, calling the situation a personnel matter.

© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
NFL: San Diego 32, Denver 3 (13 min)
NFL: Arizona 21, St. Louis 13 (21 min)
NHL: Tampa Bay 4, Atlanta 3 (OT) (44 min)
McPherson takes lead in LPGA Championship (56 min)
Alzheimer's help for blacks in Kentucky
NBA: Charlotte 104, Indiana 88
NFL: Oakland 20, Cincinnati 17
fark
Lots and lots of people would rather die than continue working for France Telecom
Doctors discover patient trapped in a 23-year 'coma' has been conscious all along
Despite efforts to discourage them, Iraqi refugees keep flocking to Detroit, since living in a war-torn...
Congratulations to the unnamed motorist who received Virginia's first $1,000 traffic ticket for...
If you are in Salinas, CA on Tuesday night and find yourself at a DUI checkpoint, you will either...
Next on the docket: Case No. 1950cv05050: Mouse vs. Duck for trademark infringement. Bonus: The...