Court weighs discrimination against whites

Published: April 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM
House Committee considers needs of Supreme Court in Washington

WASHINGTON, April 22 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court appeared split along ideological lines Wednesday as it heard argument on whether federal law bans discrimination against whites.

Though the case was brought by 20 white firefighters in New Haven, Conn. -- including one white Hispanic -- whose passing scores on a promotion test were thrown out because no blacks passed, any eventual decision by the Supreme Court could decide the long-term fate of affirmative action in the United States.

In argument, Justice Anthony Kennedy appeared sympathetic to the suing firefighters, USA Today reported. Kennedy is often the swing vote on the nine-member court between the four justice liberal bloc and the four justice conservative bloc. From the bench, Kennedy said the city would have to show a compelling reason for throwing out the test results.

The 2003 exam was designed to select 15 candidates for captain and lieutenant. When no blacks and only one Hispanic scored a passing grade, the city decided not to use the results for promotions, saying it did not want exposure to suits from blacks and Hispanics.

Citing the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans discrimination on the basis of race or sex, the white candidates filed suit. But a federal judge and a federal appeals court ruled for the city.

Their petition to the Supreme Court said the successful candidates had "expended significant sums, studied intensely and sacrificed mightily to qualify for promotions to captain and lieutenant pursuant to a professionally developed examination process. Their efforts paid off as they passed and, based on their performance, stood immediately to be promoted. Citing petitioners' race, (the city) refused to promote them and left the positions vacant in response to the exams' racially disproportionate results ... "

The Supreme Court should rule in the case before recessing for the summer.

(Ricci vs. DeStefano, No. 07-1428; and Ricci vs. DeStefano 08-328)

© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
UPI NewsTrack Health and Science News (21 min)
U.S., Japan to sign 'open skies' agreement (28 min)
UPI NewsTrack Business (44 min)
Crude oil prices rebound slightly (52 min)
'Galaxy game' lets people help astronomers (54 min)
UPI NewsTrack Quirks in the News
UPI NewsTrack Sports
fark
Photoshop this guy in reflective shades
Suing Activision over World of Warcraft? Don't forget to subpoena Depeche Mode and Winona Rider,...
Hannity: This is one of the coldest years on record, so global warming is a hoax. Science: This...
Spotted cow removed from Mad River in NY. The image in your mind's eye is wrong
This is why you can't have nice things, America: "rather than a retelling of the Nativity story...
Canadian judge rules that the Happy Gilmore golf swing is wrong, biatch