Granholm says 'no' to Obama

Published: Dec. 17, 2008 at 10:05 PM

LANSING, Mich., Dec. 17 (UPI) -- Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm said Wednesday she won't take a Cabinet post in the incoming Obama administration.

The two-term governor had been speculated to be a prime contender for secretary of labor. But a gubernatorial spokeswoman told The Detroit News Granholm's not interested and would not accept if President-elect Barack Obama offered her the job.

"The governor made it clear she does not want to be considered at this time," said Granholm spokeswoman Liz Boyd.

"She is interested only in working on the big issues facing this state: Growing the economy and creating jobs."

Boyd deflected a question about whether the 49-year-old governor had been vetted by the Obama transition team, saying "that's not material."

Other names floated as possible labor secretary candidates include Ed McElroy, former president of the American Federation of Teachers; Linda Chavez-Thompson, former AFL-CIO vice president; Mary Beth Maxwell, executive director of American Rights at Work; and Maria Echaveste, former Clinton White House adviser, the News said.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Hialeah reopens for racing (36 min)
COL BKB: Wisconsin 78, Maryland 69
'Jetman' flight ends up in Mediterranean
Report: Iverson announces NBA retirement
Obama's use of 'unprecedented' chided
Soderling first through to ATP semifinals
UPI NewsTrack Health and Science News
fark
Atheist group asks to put up sign honoring war veterans near Christmas display. Pennsylvania town...
Scientists have now created a baby bottle that heats itself up in 60 seconds. A perfect gift for...
Photoshop this guy in reflective shades
Suing Activision over World of Warcraft? Don't forget to subpoena Depeche Mode and Winona Rider,...
Hannity: This is one of the coldest years on record, so global warming is a hoax. Science: This...
Spotted cow removed from Mad River in NY. The image in your mind's eye is wrong