Egyptian official: Shalit free by November

Published: Aug. 14, 2008 at 3:55 PM
ISRAELIS DEMONSTRATE OUTSIDE THE KNESSET ON THE ONE YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE KIDNAPPING OF ISRAELI SOLDIER GILAD SHALIT IN GAZA

CAIRO, Aug. 14 (UPI) -- The head of Egyptian intelligence hopes to negotiate a deal with Hamas for the release of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit by November.

Egyptian Gen. Omar Suleiman discussed the possibility during talks in Cairo with Israeli negotiators, Ynetnews reported.

But Israeli negotiators Amos Gilad and Ofar Dekel said they feared that talks have stalled. Hamas has suggested that "heavier" prisoners must be released by the Israelis in return for Shalit. In an exchange for the bodies of two captured Israeli soldiers, Hezbollah in Lebanon received several living prisoners, including one serving a life sentence for multiple killings, as well as the bodies of Hezbollah fighters killed in Israel.

"If Israel paid so much to Hezbollah for dead soldiers, we can demand more for a living soldier," a Hamas negotiator told the Egyptian mediator.

Israel's major card is the Rafah border crossing from Gaza to Egypt. It has said that the crossing won't be opened until Shalit is freed.

Shalit, who turns 22 in two weeks, was captured in June 2006 in a raid hear the Gaza Strip.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Jockstrip: The world as we know it. (26 min)
Your Daily Horoscope
The almanac
Helicopter Moms: Little boys can be gross
COL BKB: California 95, Detroit 61
Legislation to guarantee paid sick days
NBA: Phoenix 124, New Orleans 104
fark
What does a death sentence really mean? If you're in California, it means years and years of living...
The curious case of heroin buttons
Pregnant teen arrested for burglary, goes into labor while being arrested. I hear mug shots make...
Photoshop this iguana
Ron Jeremy showing college campuses he's a master debater
A Massachusetts man is suing Bon Jovi, Time Warner and Major League Baseball for $400 billion because...