Court backs fertility treatment time off

Published: Aug. 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM

CHICAGO, Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A U.S. appeals court in Chicago has issued what may be a precedent-setting ruling for women who need time off from work for fertility treatments.

The three-judge panel has cleared the way for secretary Cheryl Hall to sue her former employer for laying her off for absenteeism in order to receive in vitro fertilization, The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The decision, the first of its kind at the federal appeals level, applies only in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin but could influence other courts or end up in the U.S. Supreme Court if a conflict arises.

The Chicago court found working women who need time off for infertility treatments can invoke the Pregnancy Discrimination Act as potential protection against adverse action.

Hall's attorney Eugene Hollander says the ruling suggests women will have to worry less about the "repercussions of taking time off for IVF," the Journal said.

Hall's former employer, Nalco, is seeking a hearing before the full, 11-judge appeals court.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Sully's hat sold to benefit schools (3 min)
Santa's office: Video games top wish lists (4 min)
Company: Aiden, Madeline 2009's top names (8 min)
Store worker gets $1.3 million overpayment (10 min)
H1N1 infants vaccine recalled (11 min)
U.S. markets lackluster Tuesday (17 min)
Mazda, Ford remain in cahoots (32 min)
fark
Jesus prepares to receive Oral
Labour arbitration panel hears name-calling case between priest and "Attila the Nun"
Calgary considers mandating sprinkler systems in every new house. They must be really love their...
Meth users in the Cape Girardeau, MO region: The local Sonics no longer offers their $20 crank special,...
Drinking tea and coffee 'can prevent diabetes'... 1 large Caramel Brulee Frappuccino Blended Crème...
Best reason for convincing your wife you need a cool, big-screen, flat panel TV for Christmas: It's...