Shark fishing contest under fire

Published: July 16, 2008 at 7:52 PM

OAK BLUFFS, Mass., July 16 (UPI) -- Animal rights activists are protesting a Massachusetts shark fishing contest, saying the event results in "destructive exploitation" of animals.

The Humane Society and the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals wrote a letter to Boston Big Game Fishing Club President Steven James, asking him to cancel the 22nd Oak Bluffs Monster Shark Tournament, The Boston Herald reported Wednesday.

The tournament is set to begin Thursday, the newspaper said.

"These are just cash-driven tournaments resulting in the destructive exploitation of these sharks," said John Grandy, of the Humane Society of the United States.

"We ask that the HSUS please leave the science of fishery management to the experts and scientists ... who are specifically chartered with managing and rebuilding the North Western Atlantic shark stocks," James responded.

James added that U.S. recreational and commercial fishermen should not be blamed "for the overfishing done in other parts of the world."

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
NASA to begin attempts to free Spirit (6 min)
UPI NewsTrack Entertainment News (6 min)
Mortgage activity up with rates mixed (7 min)
Atlanta coach, Washington players fined (19 min)
Report: Three UT players arrested (23 min)
U.S. markets head lower Thursday (35 min)
U.S. Airways attendants set to picket (41 min)
fark
Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yeah, Bow wow yippie yo yippie yeah (c)
Welcome to the internet, where men are men, women are men, and that 14 year old girl you're propositioning...
Using only a cell phone and a pelican, man turns his $2 Million Bugatti into a submarine
Unknown substance found on NJ Transit train. Probably cleanser
90% of students at City University of New York can't do basic algebra. So, you know...just like...
"Main Street merchants want crack at market" in Santa Monica, says poorly worded headline. Presumably...