N.Y.: Sept. 11 health claims exaggerated

Published: June 25, 2008 at 8:55 AM
Operation Noble Eagle

NEW YORK, June 25 (UPI) -- Attorneys for New York City say many of the injury claims made by Sept. 11, 2001, rescue and cleanup workers are spurious and exaggerated.

The city, in its first attempt to sort through and categorize the medical records of nearly 10,000 firefighters, police officers and construction workers who worked at Ground Zero in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, has found that nearly 30 percent of them pertain to common ailments, The New York Times reported Wednesday.

Some 300 workers, the city found, have admitted in court documents they suffered no injuries at all from breathing in dust generated from the collapse of the towers of the World Trade Center, the newspaper said.

The workers' lawyers said the city's review was inaccurate and skewed toward downplaying health problems suffered by workers, including respiratory or gastrointestinal illnesses as well as cancer, pulmonary disease and lung scarring, the Times said.

The lawsuits arose when workers claimed they were sickened because they didn't have the right breathing equipment during the nine-month rescue-and-recovery operation at Ground Zero, the newspaper said.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Jockstrip: The world as we know it. (29 min)
Your Daily Horoscope
The almanac
Average features key to female face beauty
Want to avoid H1N1? -- fly first class
NBA: Portland 105, Phoenix 102
Low omega-3 linked to schizophrenia risk
fark
Truck hauling 4000 cases of beer ran off the road in Papua, New Guinea. Since this is Fark, you...
Tree Man's infamous wooden growths are returning to his body. Knot again
Fugitive doctor tries to avoid capture by performing impromtu surgery on own neck
Photoshop theme: Rejected Christmas cards
Australian hottie swimmer Stephanie Rice wants a new boyfriend for Christmas. Any Farkers wanna...
This is a bat eating a banana in the kitchen. Your argument is invalid