Government justifies Spitzer investigation

Published: March. 21, 2008 at 12:45 PM

WASHINGTON, March 21 (UPI) -- The U.S. Justice Department defends its investigation of ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, saying it was necessary because of his high-ranking political status.

The department used its most intense investigative methods on Spitzer, such as reviewing his financial documents, listening to his phone calls and following him while looking into his involvement with the Emperor's Club prostitution ring, The New York Times reported Friday.

Methods used in the Spitzer case appeared to be more intense than typical prostitution investigations by the Justice Department, the Times report said. Federal prosecutors usually go easier on prostitution criminals, and fail to act unless millions of dollars, child exploitation or human trafficking are involved, it said.

Government officials have justified the depth of the investigation, saying it was necessary because Spitzer was the top elected official in New York.

"If they've got some evidence of a high-ranking public official involved in violations of federal criminal code, it may not be unreasonable for them to pursue it," Justice Department lawyer Bradley D. Simon said.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Watercooler Stories (36 min)
Jockstrip: The world as we know it.
Your Daily Horoscope
The almanac
Holidays make alcohol available to teens
COL BKB: California 79, Jacksonville 47
Alzheimer's need not end driving
fark
You know that guy who spent 23 years in a coma but aware of everything going on? Even money says...
Police searching for the grinch or grinches who crushed a gingerbread town containing 650 gingerbread...
Lovers reportedly have sex in clock tower in broad daylight - of course that's only second hand
Irish turn their annual Christmas lighting ceremony into a drunken riot. Once again
Musician appeals for return of stolen tiki. The curse never ends, Greg
Ten tips to ease the hassles of holiday flying. 'Staying home' conspicuously absent