Could Mann Act be used against Spitzer?

Published: March. 11, 2008 at 10:01 PM

ALBANY, N.Y., March 11 (UPI) -- New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer could face prosecution under the Mann Act, a 1910 federal anti-prostitution law, some observers say.

So far, Spitzer, identified as "client 9" of an expensive Manhattan escort service by The New York Times, faces no criminal charges. The New York Sun reported that prosecutors involved in the case are specialists in government corruption.

"I would expect prosecutors are looking quite broadly at the governor's use of money to see whether any public or campaign funds were involved," a former Justice Department official, Andrew Hruska, told the newspaper. "They would want to speak with all individuals whose names came up in the course of the analysis."

The Mann Act makes transporting prostitutes across state lines or persuading them to cross state lines a federal crime. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the law cannot be used to prosecute prostitutes.

In recent years, the law has been used only against human traffickers. The most famous person prosecuted under the act is probably Jack Johnson, the first black heavyweight champion. He was imprisoned for sending his white girlfriend a train ticket.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
NBA: Miami 102, New Orleans 101 (9 min)
Lost wallet found 63 years later (12 min)
NFL: New England 31, New York Jets 14 (50 min)
NFL: San Diego 32, Denver 3
NFL: Arizona 21, St. Louis 13
NHL: Tampa Bay 4, Atlanta 3 (OT)
McPherson takes lead in LPGA Championship
fark
Lots and lots of people would rather die than continue working for France Telecom
Doctors discover patient trapped in a 23-year 'coma' has been conscious all along
Despite efforts to discourage them, Iraqi refugees keep flocking to Detroit, since living in a war-torn...
Congratulations to the unnamed motorist who received Virginia's first $1,000 traffic ticket for...
If you are in Salinas, CA on Tuesday night and find yourself at a DUI checkpoint, you will either...
Next on the docket: Case No. 1950cv05050: Mouse vs. Duck for trademark infringement. Bonus: The...