Top court rules on prison guard immunity

Jan. 22, 2008 at 12:52 PM

WASHINGTON, Jan. 22 (UPI) -- A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday a prison inmate cannot sue federal prison guards about how their possessions are handled.

In a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled federal law enforcement officers are immune to lawsuits by prison inmates claiming the officers wrongly lost or misplaced the prisoners' personal property, Scotusblog.com reported.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority in Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, rejecting petitioner Abdus-Shahid Ali's argument that a federal immunity law only applies to losses of property during customs or tax collection.

"We conclude that the broad phrase 'any other law enforcement officer' covers all law enforcement officers," Thomas wrote. "(We) are unpersuaded by petitioner's attempt to create ambiguity where the statute's text and structure suggest none."

Dissenting were Justices Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Justice David Souter and Stephen Breyer. Kennedy wrote the majority opinion's analysis "cannot be squared with the longstanding recognition that a single word must not be read in isolation but instead defined by reference to its statutory context."

Like Us on Facebook for more stories from UPI.com  
Latest Headlines
Top Stories
Shark bite confirmed off North Carolina shore
Small plane crash kills two near Dallas
Justice Department investigating airlines for alleged price fixing
Lockheed Martin spotlights new tracking pod system
Britain, Western Europe endure record heat wave