Diplomats won't be forced to Iraq

Published: Nov. 16, 2007 at 10:56 AM

WASHINGTON, Nov. 16 (UPI) -- The State Department is abandoning plans to force diplomats to serve in Iraq since volunteers filled all 48 vacant positions at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is expected to announce an end to "directed assignments," The Washington Post reported Friday.

Although Foreign Service officers swear an oath to serve wherever they are sent, they have not been ordered to take posts since the Vietnam War, but Rice said forced deployments could return amid staffing shortages in Baghdad.

Critics, however, questioned the ethics of forcing unarmed Foreign Service officers to serve in the war-torn country, the newspaper reported.

"After all the bad publicity indicating that the Foreign Service would not step forward, it in fact turned out -- as most of us thought -- that they did step forward as volunteers to staff Iraq," said John Naland, president of the American Foreign Service Association, the diplomats' union.

© 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Order reprints



Additional News Stories
Retail sales flat week before Black Friday (3 min)
Pujols voted NL's most valuable (4 min)
FAA fines airlines for stranding (9 min)
Micro-endoscope is under development (9 min)
UPI NewsTrack Entertainment News (16 min)
Parking ticket can be paid with Yule gifts (18 min)
U.S. markets turn lower Tuesday (27 min)
fark
Step 1) Escape prison. Step 2) Steal cigarettes. Step 3) Return to prison with the cigarettes?
Look at the two women to your left, and the two to your right: One of the women in bed with you...
In an event that happened only once in the prior century, but twice in the last five years, hundreds...
Taking a bath with your turkey, and other things the Butterball turkey hotline suggests you not...
You're feuding with the editor of a rival newspaper. Do you c) Commission a naked sculpture of him...
As it turns out, even vegans can't stand "Tofurkey"